WATER PAGES
over 1,000 years to degrade, are recognised as a serious problem, but now, the Innovate UK grant will enable us to accelerate our technologies so that we can help the water industry with a
A recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on the concentrations of PFAS in tap water tested for 32 compounds across 716 locations. The study estimated that up to 45% of homes’ tap water could contain one or more PFAS compounds.
‘Eliminate toxic chemicals’
Fox added: “Our end-product is potentially an innovative, low-cost, efficient capture/ filtration for PFAS removal, with an advanced natural surface chemistry
Nextech’s SMZ has the desired
characteristics to successfully bind PFAS in existing infrastructure
modification to increase capture rate and capacity. We have also developed a PFAS concentration and removal technology in backwash effluent to eliminate toxic chemicals returning to the environment and reduce disposal costs.”
Per- and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of almost 5,000 industrial chemicals, used widely as water and oil repellent treatments in food packaging, consumer products, clothing, carpets, cosmetics, and firefighting foams. PFAS, which are lost to the environment during manufacture, use and disposal, have been detected in more than 90% of European rivers, and all fish sampled by the Environment Agency in the UK’s fresh, estuarine and coastal waters.
PFAS bioaccumulate and are toxic to humans and wildlife. Multiple human and animal studies (including EFSA & US lawsuit against DuPont studying 70,000 people) confirm: reduced immunity; increased infections; increased cholesterol; ulcerative colitis; decreased infant birth weight, changes to the liver, thyroid and testosterone levels, increased foetal and neonatal mortality, developmental neurotoxic effects, testicular cancer; kidney cancer.
In more detail, Nextech’s developing solution to PFAS included:
Technology 1. PFAS capture using unique properties of high purity, hydrophobic natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite ) filter media (NSF61 and BS6920 certified EU draft standard pr EN16070 for drinking water compliant). Compared to conventional sand or multimedia filtration beds, the main process advantages are:
■ Superior filtration performance, >2X multimedia filtration
46 | October 2023 |
www.draintraderltd.com
■ Higher flow capacity > 2x carbon & resins.
■ Reduced backwash time and frequency (40% backwash water
saving) ■ Lower capital cost (50% reduction)
■ Long lasting media - simple periodic backwash allows efficient operation for five years or more since it is abrasion resistant
Technology 2. Innovative (FGX3) surface conditioning of the filter bed with 5-30 kDa yeast heat-shock protein (HSP) blend and natural anionic/cationic surfactant complexes (an environmental accelerant standard-60 certified for use in potable water) creating strong anion capture for PFAS removal. Surfactants have been used successfully to modify Clinoptilolite for PFAS removal. However, HSP/ surfactant complex will give an estimated 100-fold amplification of the surfactant action. Retained activity in challenging conditions including pH stability of 1-13, 90 dec C/96h, and strong oxidants ensures longevity in function. Conservative expected Empty Bed Contact Time improvement of > 10 compared with granular carbon filtration, based on resin/ion exchange data, and potentially a dramatic decrease overall with FGX3 enhancement.
Technology 3: Back-wash PFAS concentrate treated successfully with an electrolytic coagulation pilot unit (most advanced current technology) for complete removal of PFAS before it can reach or return to the environment. Additionally, most advanced plasma vortex final destruction is to be compared with electrolytic oxidation and sonication for economic and practical viability as an onsite capture and destruction option.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88
