BUSINESS NEWS ld prepare for possible hard exit PTD compliance and consumer awareness facing the sector if the UK leaves the EU without a deal
consequence, insolvency protection arrangements made in the UK will no longer be recognised by other EU regulators. So what must travel companies do?
Options for PTD compliance Te default position is that UK companies must arrange insolvency protection in accordance with the rules of each EU market they sell into. Tis means a guarantee as
determined by the Kammarkollegiet for sales in Sweden, a separate guarantee as determined by the Rejsegarantifonden for sales in Denmark, a CAR licence (or one of the permited alternative options) for sales in Ireland, and so on. Clearly, seting up these separate
arrangements is unatractive for a company selling into various EU markets given the time and expense involved. Yet this has remained an atractive
(or the least bad) option for many because it allows a company’s headquarters to remain in the UK. However, there are some
unwelcome exceptions to this general rule. Some markets, such as Sweden,
will only allow travel companies to join their scheme if they have first created a local branch or subsidiary in Sweden. Tis can bring tax liabilities in the local market, undermining one of the major benefits of this option. An alternative option, and an
atractive one from a regulatory perspective, is to create an ‘EU hub’ – such as an EU place of establishment – and use the insolvency protection arrangements of the place of establishment to sell into all EU markets. Te trouble with this option
travelweekly.co.uk Upon a ‘hard’ Brexit, the UK will become a
‘third country’ for the purposes of the PTD. As a consequence, UK insolvency protection arrangements will no longer be recognised by other EU regulators
is that a ‘place of establishment’ requires a real presence, ie an office and people. Te rules are clear that a post box will not be enough. Tere are structural ways in
which the size of the footprint can be minimised, but a real footprint of some sort is still required. Tese options are both workable
for UK-based travel companies looking for a way to continue selling to EU-based consumers aſter a hard Brexit. However, the reality is that both
these solutions take time to set up and implement. Tere are also broader challenges.
Aside from the need to comply with travel regulations, there are similar
cross-border issues in relation to selling travel insurance or transferring customer data. Ten there are practical risks to
manage: travel disruption, exchange- rate volatility and the right of employees to work in the UK and overseas, to name but a few.
What should travel businesses be doing? Given the risk of a hard Brexit, travel businesses should be geting ready for it. From a legal, regulatory and
practical perspective, the first step is to understand how Brexit might affect a business so that steps can be taken to address the risks.
Ursula von der Leyen, president-elect of the European Commission
Tese steps take time to
implement, so the sooner one gets going the beter. Finally, in preparing for Brexit,
let us not forget the customer. Holidaymakers will need to do their part for a holiday to continue smoothly following a no-deal Brexit. Are customers aware of the new
requirements concerning passport validity, international driving permits, insurance green cards, and so on? Such crucial details are probably
not as widely understood as they should be, not least because information is not easy to find and digest. Grasping the detail on these
issues is likely to be important if businesses are to inform and reassure customers as we head towards Halloween.
Rhys Griffiths, Fox Williams:
rgriffiths@foxwilliams.com
19 SEPTEMBER 2019 87
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96