search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
51 BUILDING


INSIGHTS LIVE


Round table chair, editor James Parker


Unlocking MMC & Off site in Residential Developments


M


MC (Modern Methods of Construction), and more specifi cally Df Designing for anufacture and ssembly, have long been hailed as the answer to the housebuilding sector’s ‘triple whammy’ of meeting spiralling housing targets, while achieving building performance and tackling the skills crisis. We brought together leading modular construction specialists, volume housebuilders, consultants, architects and academics, to discuss solutions to one of the industry’s biggest conundrums; why can’t mainstream housebuilding seem to embrace 


s well as unforeseen blockers like post-Brexit infl ation, ovid, confl icts, and a housing market slowdown, the industry culture is wedded to ultimate supply chain fl exibility in project decision- making, despite the current model having seen many ‘traditional’ businesses go under in recent years. There have been some key examples of  success, particularly large scale, but takeup has been noticeably slow – when engagement with the methods will be essential to deliver the Government’s housebuilding goals including new  ndy Burnham’s promise of the “biggest council house building programme since the post-war period.”


It’s impossible to shy away from the reality that a series of high-profi le fi rms have pulled  investment following a lack of a pipeline of work to support their factories. But while major players from G, Berkeley and Top at to Ilke omes, aledonian odular and Swan ousing ssociation have retreated from the fray, a few like Vistry present at the


round table are doubling down on their commitments to . t a time when volume housebuilders are reticent to even buy land and build traditionally as sales plummet, is an increasingly de-risked offsite sector looking more viable In order to achieve the Government’s . million new homes target, a large proportion will need to be offsite manufactured, whether ategory  volumetric, ategory  panelised, or other varieties. But a major shift is still reuired in the industry to embrace production of precision-made homes at scale offsite; although a long-term view would see this as a means to recruit a new generation of professionals.


In order to try and identify solutions, the round table delved into why  still only fi gured in around  of U homes, and timber remained underused in ngland. Traditional approaches to building houses have been seen as potentially inadeuate in the era of more rigorous performance standards and policing, and with sponsor partners Ibstock Brick and edite Smartply, we explored how to break down the stubborn barriers to adoption.


Sponsors took a key role in the discussion, giving it a practical focus, with edite Smartply for one having recently tackled the problem in a survey of timber frame fi rms on their views around MMC, and accepted the need for more standardisation. We also discovered how architects have embraced  – Nigel Ostime of awkinsBrown explained how he was working with IB, on its third iteration of the Overlay to the IB lan of Work; helping to inject  design into projects in a systematic way.


owever, fellow architect ory Bergin of T Design noted that “very few architecture schools teach .” We also heard how a few volume housebuilders like Barratt ondon are fully tethering their business model to the approach. nd the Timber oadmap was being “really positively supported” by the industry, in the words of edite Smartply’s oly Ward, who added that seven out of the  “top housebuilders” were investing in offsite timber frame. With Vistry continuing to invest in  restarting the eicester timber offsite


ROUND TABLE ATTENDEES • Sam Stacey, Director, A7C •


• Rory Bergin, Partner, HTA Design architects


• Andrew Orriss, Interim Chief Executive, Structural Timber Association


•


Stephen Wightman, Director, UK MMC Lead, AtkinsRéalis


• Nigel Ostime , Consultant, Hawkins\Brown architects


• Richard Quarry, Equity Partner, Baker Ruff Hannon LLP


• Jack Brayshaw, Director of Research and Innovation, Vistry


ROUND TABLE SPONSORS • Andrew Shepherd, Managing Director, Ibstock Brick


• Roly Ward, Head of Business Development, Medite Smartply


Tony Woods, Technical Manager - Construction and Sustainability, Procurement for Housing


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84