TRACKING HOUSEBUILDERS’ STRATEGIES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FUTURE HOMES STANDARD INDUSTRY VIEWFINDER 47
Which of the above options, if any, do you consider to be the biggest risks to delivering Future Homes Standard-compliant homes?
infl ation, installer skills shortages, grid constraints, supply chain readiness, and customer demand. The research provided an updated picture of industry readiness, delivery confi dence and specifi cation trends as the sector prepares for the transition towards S-compliant developments.
The key change under the new art , brought in under the S umbrella, is the airtightness target used in the ‘notional building’ used as a model to test a home design’s performance against. This increases from mhm at a art to mhm under the interim S . compliance route used for the initial phase of the S. There is a ‘legal backstop’ minimum air tightness of mhm, but that’s seen as “a worst-case ceiling, not a working target.” ost new build homes achieve air-tightness in the - m hm range, but achieving the new notional target of m can’t be achieved by design only. It demands a better level of site discipline, better detailing at junctions and penetrations, and independent verifi cation of the fi nished building’s performance by a ualifi ed professional. s stated earlier, the transitional arrangements for fi rms building S-compliant homes mean that home designs with an initial building notice or full plans application submitted before arch can be built under previous art rules, provided construction commences by arch . ealistically, all new home schemes which are being initiated currently should be designed and built to the new reuirements.
KEY CHANGES
side from limited fabric upgrades, the main changes in the S are the reuirement to transition to low-carbon heating, alongside the introduction of renewables in the form of V to the tune of of a home’s ground fl oor area in the notional building. hasing out gas boilers means shifting entirely to electric-powered alternatives like air-source heat pumps or heat networks, which means changes in utility coordination and grid capacity reuirements.
igher insulation and tighter airtightness demand complex mechanical ventilation and wastewater heat recovery systems to prevent indoor air uality and overheating issues. On-site renewable integration and V charger installations complicate roof design, procurement, and site logistics. Beyond these practical challenges, the issues of the work pipeline for schemes with multiple homes boil down to the need to manage mixed timelines across different phases and sites. If done badly, this creates inconsistent specifi cations, supply chain confusion, and potential costly reworking of projects. nd as ever, the perennial skills shortages in the industry compound all of these challenges, with a lack of specialised labour, and technical expertise in planning and S assessment makes signing off projects and verifying good uality execution at scale diffi cult for traditional builders.
PRODUCED IN ASSOCIATION WITH
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84