search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
30 SOCIAL HOUSING PROJECT REPORT


The White Lion scheme comprises 18 apartments for social rent – a mix of one and two beds


THE LAYOUT WAS ALSO DESIGNED WITH SECURE ACCESS AND “CLEAR LINES OF MANAGEMENT” WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY MAINTAINING A WELCOMING ENVIRONMENT


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


nown as the White ion scheme, due to its location ehind the White ion pu in Swinton, the deelopment comprises  new social rent apartments, which are a mi of one- and two-edrooms. istorically the site had a ariety of uses, and at the time of eginning the proect it was home to a car par and grassed area. t was a win-win for orousing, helping local people access high-uality homes and genuinely affordale rents while maing effectie use of a rownfi eld site within an estalished community, ather eplains. he proect is only fi e minutes from local shops, Swinton town centre and pulic transport lins, proiding access to necessary amenities and eeping residents connected to the community.


A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT ollaoration is ey on most proects, and this was certainly no eception. orousing wored with construction and deelopment company Whitfi eld  rown  who also too care of the planning application  on the deliery of the proect.


he land-inclusie nature of the proect meant that assemling the right team was crucial. Whitfi eld  rown appointed  rchitects as designers for the proect, while orousing engaged 


roects now rees  Sommer as employers agent.


he deelopment was also supported y funding from omes ngland and the reater anchester omined uthority  rownfi eld und, which was launched in  from the s m rownfi eld ousing und. ts designed to unloc housing deelopment on rownfi eld sites where it otherwise wouldnt e possile, or wouldnt happen at the desired pace. n total the scheme cost .m, of which .m was funded y omes ngland and , y the  rownfi eld und. he remaining cost was funded y orousing inestment and group loan facilities. ather says the grant funding element was crucial t played an important role in maing the scheme iale and ensuring the homes could e deliered for social rent, he eplains. unding programmes such as these help housing proiders ring forward affordale housing deelopments that might otherwise e challenging to delier ecause of construction costs and maret conditions.


STRIKING THE RIGHT BALANCE he sie and numer of apartments in the deelopment was carefully considered. n total there are  apartments, comprising  one-edroom apartments at  m2


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84