search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UPFRONTS


72% OF UK SHOPPERS SAY THEY’RE MORE EXCITED WHEN THEIR ONLINE PURCHASES ARRIVE IN THE MAIL THAN WHEN THEY BUY IN-STORE.


(Source: Razorfish Digital Dopamine Report) Ready for Reaction


Facebook users had been clamouring for it since the ‘like’ button arrived in 2009 and in September this year Mark Zuckerberg finally announced that the ‘dislike’ button was on its way. Except, it turned out, it wasn’t. After speculation over


what form the new function might take, in October Facebook started to roll out six emojis called ‘Reactions’. These include ‘love’, ‘yay’, ‘angry’, ‘sad’ and the helpfully elastic ‘wow’. Together they promise relief for anyone who’s wondered whether it’s really appropriate to ‘like’ news of a friend’s impending redundancy. “What people really want is the ability to


average a 35 per cent growth rate, until 2017. It’s not just traditional


mobile devices that are driving the trend. Barclaycard and Lyle & Scott recently created a contactless jacket with a


express empathy. Not every moment is a good moment or lends itself to a like,” Zuckerberg said in September. “It’s not a ‘dislike’ button,” wrote Chief Product Officer Chris Cox,


people really want is the ability to express empathy


What


“though we hope it addresses the spirit of this request more broadly.”


Expanding the range of quick emotional responses is a smart move on Facebook’s


chip in the cuff. And at London Fashion Week this year designer Henry Holland and Visa Europe unveiled a ring


embedded with an NFC chip that could be used to make purchases.


part. It enables brands to analyse sentiment more rapidly than text-based content. It opens the door to instant feedback and real-time messaging. And it avoids the troll-fest threatened by the initial ‘dislike’ button. It’ll be interesting to see if this new development, clearly designed with mobile use in mind, has an impact on the volume of comments posted on the platform. Ultimately, however, it’ll be users who decide on etiquette and usage; over time the existing ‘like’ button evolved to convey a much broader range of meaning than simple approval. And for everyone, not least Facebook, that’s a whole lot of new data incoming.


The downside to a


cash-free future: how will toss-of-the-coin decisions be made? Naturally, there’s already an app for that.


DICTIONARY INTERNET OF THINGS


The term’s been buzzing around for a while but 2015 has been the year that the internet of things became, well, a thing. The term was coined in 1999 by British technologist and entrepreneur Kevin Ashton and, from a marketing perspective, describes a new relationship between brands, consumers, technology and data. By 2020, according to Gartner, brands will have access to 25 billion connected objects, each one a mine of information. One school of


thought, eloquently outlined by Ray Kingman in TechCrunch


earlier this year, suggests that as a consequence marketing in the future will move towards a subscription- based model. Rather than hollering at consumers to attract their attention, brands will aim to own the relationship and automatically supply or update consumers with goods and services as required. As connectivity becomes constant, marketing will be increasingly driven by data and analytics. Know what a user needs before they know themselves and you’ve got a captive audience.


DIGITAL


CONTENT MARKETING IN 2015 GENERATES 3X AS MANY LEADS AS TRADITIONAL OUTBOUND MARKETING BUT COSTS 62% LESS.


(Source: Smartinsights/Demand Metric)


GENERATE 60% MORE ENGAGEMENT. (Source: Axonnmedia/Buffer)


SHORTER FACEBOOK POSTS GET 23% MORE INTERACTION. POSTS UNDER 250 CHARACTERS CAN


The


7 issue 26 november 2015


3x


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68