72 Advertising feature LEGAL CORNER
Thinking About Relocating With Your Child? Why Expert Advice Can Make All the Difference
R
elocation cases, whether within the UK or abroad, are among the most emotionally charged and legally complex areas of
family law. Parents often begin the process with understandable hopes - a new job, family support elsewhere, a fresh start or a better quality of life – but the court’s focus is not on the parents’ aspirations. Every relocation case is decided entirely on what is in the child’s best interests and that requires meticulous preparation, a child centred approach and clear, credible evidence.
This is where Amelia Smith, specialist Family solicitor at Wollens, stands out. Amelia offers calm, strategic guidance through what can be one of the most stressful decisions a parent faces. Her measured yet robust approach ensures parents avoid the common pitfalls that so often undermine and lead to unsuccessful relocation applications.
10 Common Mistakes Parents Make When Considering Relocation
1. Announcing the move abruptly to the other parent and presenting it as a done deal. 2. Attempting to relocate without consent or a court order, exposing themselves to legal risk. 3. Underestimating the importance of the child’s relationship with the other parent and extended family. 4. Failing to provide a detailed, practical plan - particularly around schooling. 5. Focusing on their own needs instead of the child’s welfare. 6. Offering unrealistic contact arrangements after the move. 7. Ignoring financial implications, including travel costs and housing. 8. Relying on vague or aspirational ideas, rather than solid evidence. 9. Not clearly linking the move to the child’s welfare or long term stability. 10. Not obtaining specialist legal advice early, leading to weaknesses that are hard to fix later.
Amelia regularly advises clients on these issues at
www.wollens.co.uk 01803 213251 67 THE TERRACE, TORQUAY, DEVON TQ1 1DP EMAIL - INFO
WOLLENS.CO.UK
an early stage, helping them avoid mistakes before they become problems.
What the Court Considers in Relocation Cases
Under the Children Act 1989, the child’s welfare is the court’s paramount consideration. Judges weigh:
Amelia Smith
• The child’s relationship with each parent—its strength, quality and importance. • The likely impact of the move on the child’s emotional wellbeing, including any reduction in contact. • Whether meaningful contact can realistically be maintained, not just whether it is technically possible. • Each parent’s willingness and ability to support the child’s relationship with the other parent. • The child’s wishes and feelings, depending on their age and maturity.
A well prepared, child focused relocation plan significantly improves the court’s confidence in the proposal.
Rachel Carter, Head of the Family team says, “Amelia works closely with clients to produce persuasive, evidence based applications that address the issues judges look at most carefully. Her clear and detailed approach ensures a child focused rationale and realistic contact proposals. She helps clients build the robust evidence base courts expect for an application to be successful.”
Why Instruct Amelia Smith at Wollens? Relocation cases require a careful strategy, sensitivity to family dynamics and a deep understanding of how judges approach these applications.
Amelia combines all of these qualities with a practical, approachable manner that clients value at what is often a difficult crossroads in their lives. She provides realistic advice, guides parents step by step and ensures every detail of your proposal supports the core question: why the move is in your child’s best interests.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108
