search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech


PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.155 page 1


Friction modifiers: Study of an inverse relationship between engine efficiency and wear


Dr. Raj Shah and Nicholas Douglas, Koehler Instrument Company, Holtsville, NY Introduction


In the pursuit of achieving improved fuel economy and/or increased engine power, several advancements with engine oils to improve engine efficiency have surfaced. The most prominent example is work done to reduce internal friction (or traction) of an engine lubricant by reducing apparent viscosity. While there is no theoretical limit to how thin an engine lubricant’s viscosity can be to maximise efficiency, an engine has a theoretical limit for lubricant film thickness. Beyond that point, or too thin of a fluid film; premature wear and engine failure can occur. To address this problem, friction modifiers (FMs) have been employed to provide additional boundary lubrication preventing engine parts from contact, and reducing wear.


The importance of FMs has increased dramatically as engine lubricant viscosity and film thickness decreased in recent years to meet governmental regulations on OEM fleet fuel efficiency. FMs can permit use of lower viscosity engine lubricants to meet the needed engine efficiency requirements while managing or even enhancing engine durability.


This review will discuss the current state of engine oil friction modifiers, advancements into different classes of modifiers, their current applications, outcomes of use, and future projections for these modifiers.


Classes of FMs and how they are applied Organic friction modifiers (OFMs) Friction modifiers can be divided into several classes; these include organic friction modifiers, inorganic friction modifiers (iOFMs), and functionalised polymers [2]. Structurally, organic friction modifiers (OFMs) have an amphiphilic molecular structure, like a cell membrane Polar heads of this structure allow preferential migration toward polar surfaces (i.e., metal). Figure 1 introduces typical OFM structure for a friction modifier. Depending on how densely packed the modifier is, variations in friction coefficients will exist [3]. Amphiphilic structure in additives is key to OFM structure since nonpolar forces allow the structure to retain shape, allowing the OFM to slide across surfaces. Primarily with metal surfaces, anti-friction properties work upon adsorption to the surface; in this case, engine surfaces [4]. OFMs


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.184 DECEMBER 2024 27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60