DIGITAL PAYOFF: SAFETY, SPEED, AND SAVINGS
The advantages that digital tools bring to rotorcraft maintenance are varied and substantial.
“The biggest advantage is the ability to move from simply asking ‘When is maintenance due?’ to asking ‘What is the condition of the aircraft?’” Wilson said. “These technologies streamline troubleshooting by providing rapid, accurate access to information. For aircraft equipped with HUMS, maintainers can monitor vibration trends and proactively address issues before they lead to unscheduled maintenance.”
The ability of digital twins and other AI-enabled tools to proactively diagnose issues and recommend solutions is another major benefit, particularly because all of this can be done long before the aircraft ever comes into the shop.
“AI-driven systems help us streamline workflows, improve planning, enhance the accuracy of technical documentation analysis, and ultimately raise the level of service we provide,” said Campagna. “These solutions allow us to reduce turnaround times, strengthen communication, and optimize resource allocation well before any aircraft touches a hangar floor. The same data-driven approach has been extended to forecast spare-parts demand and optimize inventory under the Predictive for Logistics project.”
For Sikorsky, this predictive power directly influences regulatory maintenance schedules. “One of the most significant advantages of combining digital tools and machine learning is the ability to better understand aircraft and component performance over time and determine where scheduled maintenance intervals may be safely extended,” added Kelsch. “On the S-92A, Sikorsky has worked with the FAA and other regulatory authorities to extend certain inspection intervals and keep components on-wing longer. These improvements can reduce operating and maintenance costs while increasing aircraft availability for operators.”
“The biggest advantage is reduced downtime,” Smith said. “Adding AR training and AI-driven analytics gives technicians a cleaner digital workflow and instant access to what they need, which cuts both errors and training time. A second advantage is real-time, data-driven parts forecasting. Since most of what goes into our aircraft is built right here in Torrance, [California,] we can get ahead of parts demand and get the right part to the right mechanic faster than most organizations can move. The third is safety. Capturing that knowledge in a digital, repeatable format means a less experienced tech can run a scenario multiple times before they’re doing it live.”
One non-technical, but very useful benefit, of this new model is the financial impact. When maintenance can be done on a preventive rather than reactive basis, operators aren’t hit with sudden, unexpected expenses as often, allowing them to manage their maintenance budgets in a more planned and livable manner.
The bottom line according to Smith: “Reduced downtime, better safety and reliability, lower operating costs, and real data to plan around. When an aircraft spends less time grounded, our customers get back to the mission faster.”
AI CAN’T TURN A WRENCH
Clearly, today’s digital tools can do a lot to improve and enhance rotorcraft maintenance. This doesn’t mean human technicians are doomed. While AI-enabled systems are powerful, they cannot turn a wrench.
“While digital systems such as health and usage monitoring provide valuable data and trend analysis, they cannot replace the need for skilled hands-on maintenance,” said Wilson.
“
These technologies can identify issues and optimize inspection intervals, but physical repairs and technical expertise remain essential. Ultimately, technology serves as a powerful support tool, not a substitute for experienced technicians.”
“Digital technologies are not designed to replace skilled and experienced rotorcraft maintainers,” Kelsch told Rotor Pro. “They are designed to enhance their expertise and improve overall supportability.”
Furthermore, as impressive as these digital tools are, they are not infallible. “Advanced digital analytics and AI tools remain constrained by data quality, completeness, and consistency, which vary across rotorcraft platforms, configurations, and operator practice,” said Campagna. “Additionally, successful deployment requires seamless integration with existing maintenance and planning workflows, while strict regulatory certification and validation standards make widespread adoption a gradual, methodical process.”
rotorpro.com
85
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92
