search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MY 2 CENTS


employment, low-level operations, or the unique requirements of a military aircraft, that individual still has to learn how to fly a helicopter. Learning to hold altitude is not uniquely military. Neither is understanding translating tendency,


retreating blade stall,


weather, airspace, instrument procedures, aircraft performance, or good aeronautical decision making. Those are pilot skills, and the fundamentals do not change simply because of the uniform the student will eventually wear.


Perhaps we have spent too many years combining the creation of a pilot with the creation of a military aviator when they are actually two separate objectives. A civilian training organization does not need to replace a military flight school to provide value. Its job may simply be to deliver a student who is better prepared when military flight training begins.


None of this means civilian training is automatically better. It has to prove itself. Graduation rates, safety, cost, training time, and attrition all matter. Most importantly, performance at the next military training command matters. If these students require less remediation, progress more consistently, demonstrate stronger aircraft control skills, and complete advanced military training at higher rates, then we will have accomplished something far more important than finding a less expensive way to build flight hours.


We will have created a better starting point for the military to do what only the military can do.


Perhaps the future of military flight training does not have to begin by teaching someone to become a military aviator. There is plenty of time, expertise, and necessity for that training later. At the beginning, maybe our responsibility can be much simpler:


Teach them to be pilots first. The military will teach them to be military aviators.


Randy Rowles has been an FAA pilot examiner for 20 years for all helicopter certificates and ratings. He holds an FAA Gold Seal Flight Instructor Certificate, NAFI Master Flight Instructor designation, and was the 2013 recipient of the HAI Flight Instructor of the Year Award. Rowles is currently the owner of the Helicopter Institute. He can be reached at randyrowlesdpe@gmail.com


rotorpro.com


11


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92