Challenges when determining mycotoxin contamination levels
Preventative measures such as quality control of feed or using mycotoxin binders may be the best approach to minimise the negative effects of mycotoxins.
BY JOSEP GARCIA-SIRERA, PRODUCT MANAGER TOXINBINDERS, AGRIFIRM W
hen dealing with mycotoxin contamination, the first problem is to diagnose and find out the original contamination level of the feed/ grain. Unfortunately, it is not always possible
to identify the mycotoxins that caused the different symp- toms or lesions. In cases of low contamination, the issue be- comes even more difficult because often the symptoms in the animals are not conclusive. There are numerous reasons why mycotoxin exposure cannot be reconfirmed by randomly analysing the source, i.e., the feed:
Sampling Mycotoxins are not evenly distributed. The main reason is that fungi don´t grow everywhere, but only in specific places also called “hot spots”. If proper sampling procedures are not fol- lowed, analytical results are likely to underestimate the myco- toxins contamination. It is estimated that a correct representa- tive sample for mycotoxin analysis would require an initial sample of more than 20 kg for every 100 tons of feed/grain. It is estimated that more than 97% of errors in getting proper results of mycotoxin content come from sampling errors only.
Laboratory techniques Results may vary depending on the type of test. HPLC has a higher sensitivity than ELISA. Better and better techniques are being developed. Normally not a source of error. Conjugated or masked mycotoxins Mycotoxins adhere to other nutrients such as sugars (glu- cose), fatty acids or amino acids creating complexes that con- ventional tests fail to detect. The conjugated mycotoxins are hydrolysed inside the host (animals) and released. It is esti- mated that conjugated mycotoxins can account for up to 60% of total mycotoxins content.
Other indirect methods that are not based on direct analysis of feed are:
Histopathology This method allows to identify characteristic lesions in target organs caused by specific mycotoxins. Good for diagnosis, but the correlation to the original contamination can only be established in relative levels: low, high exposure, but not with a numerical value.
Identification of markers or metabolites of mycotoxins A technique based on the identification of markers or metab- olites in body tissues, and to establish a correlation between marker levels and original contamination/exposure. Ideally, the metabolite/marker will have two characteristics: • The sample can be obtained without slaughtering the animals. Mainly because of animal welfare and because, in situations of low mycotoxin contamination, the main concern is simply loss of productivity.
• There should be a strong correlation between detected levels of marker/metabolite in the fluid/tissue and the original contamination in the feed.
Some examples are:
Sphingosine and sphinganine ratios in blood, associated with exposure to Fumonisin. Normally it is used to compare groups of exposed and unexposed animals, not to determine the original contamination. Aflatoxin M1 in cow´s milk, a marker of Aflatoxin B1 and B2. This substance is regulated in several countries and legal lim- its have been set. It does serve the purpose of determining the original contamination based on marker/metabolite level. Metabolite levels in body fluids/tissues. Several mycotoxins and their metabolites can be analysed in blood and there is a strong correlation to the original feed contamination. The main problem is that blood levels are strongly affected by the time of sampling after eating. So, the time of sampling must be taken into account when trying to calculate the original feed contamination. Other examples are metabolite content in the bile, which remains more constant over time than blood levels.
What is the best approach? It is difficult to determine actual mycotoxin contamination analysing parameters before or after exposure to the animal. On the other hand, there is no doubt of the detrimental effects of mycotoxin exposure, so the best approach is to take preventative measures such as quality control of feed and use of mycotoxin binders.
▶ MYCOTOXINS | NOVEMBER 2021
Mycotoxins that are found in wheat are main- ly Fusarium tox- ins such as niva- lenol (NIV) and fumonisins (FUM).
PHOTO: AGRIFIRM 59
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
