EDITOR’S TAKE TSD at 30: Much the Same Yet ... Written by Ryan Gray |
ryan@stnonline.com I
t amazes me that with so many challenges facing the industry in 2022, a look back 30 years reveals a similar landscape. Sure, the specifics have changed. But at the first National Conference and Exhibition on Trans-
porting Students with Disabilities held in early March 1992, topics included emergency evacuations, special equip- ment needs, and wheelchair transportation. All these and then some are on the agenda next month as TSD Confer- ence returns to the Dallas area (a suburb of Frisco). School Transportation News was only in its seventh
month of publication when Roseann Schwaderer, then publisher of the Federal News Services’ “Transporting Students with Disabilities” newsletter, produced the first conference out of the need to bring topics to the table for discussion and training, all for the betterment of the most at-risk student population. Collaboration was a key theme, and it continues, even with STN acquiring the TSD Conference from Schwaderer in 2012. The common theme then was the student transporter perspective was seldom if ever included in Individual Education Program meetings. Other school administra- tors and parents were making transportation decisions for students when absent from the table were those who provided the service. Sound familiar? The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act allows school districts to provide related services in the Least Restrict Environment that is “appropriate” for the student. Appropriate is a loaded word with different meanings for different people. For example, parents might think it’s appropriate their child receives door-to-door service for 17 years. But that might contradict the school therapist’s goals for that student or the spirit of other IEP goals. It’s transportation’s job to provide access to school
but to also do so efficiently, not to mention safely, and in support of the child’s IEP. Perhaps over a certain number of school years (or perhaps even throughout a given school year), the student can transition from being picked up at their front door to their driveway to the sidewalk to two houses down to the end of the block, if that is what is truly best for the child’s development. I still hear many district representatives say that door-
to-door service is standard for all students with IEPs because it’s the right thing to do. Is it really? This industry continues to grapple with this and other
similar issues discussed in 1992. One keynote at that first TSD was presented by William Tyrell of the U.S. Depart- ment of Education’s Office of Civil Rights. He discussed the
10 School Transportation News • OCTOBER 2022
impact AIDs was having on the cognitive development of children, predicting that infections would be the leading cause of brain damage in children by the late 1990s. Early detection and intervention improved those outcomes, yet we find ourselves with similar questions today about COVID-19. The jury is out on the long-term impact of the disease and of vaccinations. It certainly has changed the way student transporters clean the school bus. The other keynote speaker that first year returns next
month: Linda Bluth. A member of the TSD Tenured Faculty and STN contributor, Bluth has become widely recognized by student transporters over the past three decades for her expertise. In 1992, she astutely noted that alternative fuels would play an increasing role in the industry and that student transporters needed backup plans in case buses break down or drivers get sick (or, today, new bus orders don’t show up or drivers quit or never apply for the job in the first place). She also noted that transportation would inevitably
serve more infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Witness the evolving Head Start regulations for transportation and the national trend toward universal preschool. Additionally, the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assis- tance Act had barely been signed five years earlier. Over the ensuing decades, transportation service for students experiencing homelessness has become a larger share of school district ridership numbers, so much so that it helped to launch an entirely new service model in the form of non-yellow-bus transportation companies. At the same time, as Bluth predicted, student transporters needed to learn as much as possible about providing service to the most medically fragile students and collab- orate with professionals to do so. There remain far too many questions today. But what has changed is these conversations and others are very much out in the open. As one expert shared with me recently, school districts are much more familiar with these and other challenges, and they are better equipped to tackle them. TSD Conference has made available many more resources to student transporters then what were available when that first historic event was held. I look forward to meeting with attendees next month to celebrate the progress made over the past 30 years and to buckle down on the work ahead. ●
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70
