WORLD NEWS
impacts. Kirsi Maria Laitala from Consumption Research Norway said that washing machine technology and detergent performance had improved tremendously over the last two decades, however consumer behaviour was lagging behind. Major consumer issues were detergent overdosing, washing temperatures and washing frequency, leading to high energy and water impacts of laundry products.
SUSTAINABLE CLEANING PRODUCTS SUMMIT BRINGS
MAJOR OUTCOMES The second Sustainable Cleaning Products Summit, hosted in Paris at the end of 2016, highlighted some of the sustainability shortcomings in the detergent and cleaning product industries. Summit participants called for greater attention to green formulations, packaging and consumer behaviour.
The summit began with an opening address by Professor Dr. Michael Braungart, co-founder of McDonough Braungart Design. He said that if detergent companies were serious about sustainability, they need to go beyond ‘efficiency thinking’ and incremental reductions in impacts. He called for products to be designed so their materials can be re-used at the end of their lives. Method, Frosch, and Ecover were cited as examples of brands following this Cradle-To-Cradle design approach.
Jürgen Stichling from ThinkStep highlighted the importance of sustainability metrics. By undertaking life-cycle analysis (LCA), he showed how the carbon footprint of detergent raw materials could be measured. He
www.tomorrowscleaning.com
encouraged companies to use LCA to create eco-friendly detergents. With concerns about sustainable sourcing of palm oil, Jessica Custer from Fairtrade USA made the case for sustainable coconut oil. The organisation is creating sustainable supply chains for fairtrade coconut oil by working directly with growers in the Philippines.
Ecover, arguably the greenest cleaning brand in Europe, shared its experiences with metrics. According to Tom Domen, the company has ‘a risk-based’ approach to using metrics. Its priorities are human health and environmental health when creating home care products. Dr. Nadereh Afsharmanesh, from the American brand Earth-Friendly Products, said it has a similar approach when designing its ecological products. The brand is carbon neutral, water neutral and zero waste.
In a dedicated workshop, Peter Malaise of
Meta.Consort Partnership discussed the thorny subject of sustainability in detergents. He questioned the concept of sustainable surfactants, and whether such products actually existed. According to Malaise, a sustainable surfactant needs to be ecologically responsible, socially equitable and economically fair.
With most cleaning product companies focusing on environmental aspects, there was a call to address consumer
The issues of consumer behaviour, green formulations, sustainable packaging and social value will be further explored in the next Sustainable Cleaning Products Summit, hosted in New York City on May 2-3rd.
Organised by Organic Monitor, the aim of the Sustainable Cleaning Products Summit is to advance sustainability in the detergents industry by debating key issues in a high-level forum.
www.sustainablecleaningsummit.com Tomorrow’s Cleaning | 17
To make it easy for consumers to buy green home care products, Coop Denmark said that it has launched such products under its Anglamark private label. The supermarket chain said that it worked with experts to identify and phase out a ‘dirty dozen’ of chemicals from its home care and personal care products. Riikka Poukka from Deloitte said there was an opportunity for home care brands to engage with consumers more. She called for brands to be more active in communicating their green initiatives to customers.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76