search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MICROSCOPY & IMAGING


Te blue curve shows the horizontal angular dependence of the relative quantum efficiency of the interline transfer CCD image sensor. From an incident angle of 5° and higher, the relative quantum efficiency drops significantly, while the vertical dependence is less pronounced, which can be explained by the fact that in vertical direction the light sensitive area nearly covers the whole pixel while horizontally half or more of the area is used by the shielded register.


FROM FRONTSIDE TO BACKSIDE ILLUMINATION However, the micro-lenses cannot collect and focus all ray angles of incoming light. Further, the semiconductor manufacturing process contributes additional layers above the photodiodes (figure 3, depicting the wiring, the transistors and the capacitors). Te electronics in these layers can cause light to be scattered and absorbed, resulting in a loss of light to charge conversion. Te loss of light due to physical blocking and scattering by electronics is more pronounced in CMOS image sensors with small pixel pitches and higher pixel counts (>4 MP) than many CCD sensors. Due to massive adoption of CMOS sensors (e.g. smartphone cameras) semiconductor manufacturers have developed methods to process the wafer with the image sensors effectively reversed, and a large part of the substrates physically and chemically etched away. Tis process results in image sensors that are effectively illuminated from the back, and the light reaches the photodiodes more directly (Fig. 3b).


Fig. 3. Schematic cross section through a frontside illuminated CMOS image sensor with micro lenses (a) and a back- side illuminated CMOS image sensor with micro lenses (b) to illustrate the effect of frontside versus backside illumination


Backside illumination of current CMOS image sensors has seen quantum efficiencies better than 90%. By the introduction of an additional surface (the surface of the backside), there are also additional dark current and noise sources added, the caveat being that many backside illuminated image sensors have higher dark current compared to the frontside illuminated counterparts.


BACKSIDE ILLUMINATED IMAGE SENSORS WITH MICROLENSES Te advantage of having fewer layers above the photodiodes (higher sensitivity) also presents a disadvantage in decreased sharpness – technically described as modulation transfer function (MTF). Due to the remaining substrate above the photodiodes, backside illuminated image sensors generally show a decreased MTF,


and if light arrives at particular angles, can be scattered or incorrectly guided to the next pixel. Luckily, the same microlens method, initially developed to increase the fill factor, now improves the MTF. Fig. 4 illustrates the light rays hitting a backside illuminated image sensor under an angle (Fig. 4a), and showing that the microlenses (Fig. 4b) help collect the light at the photodiodes belonging to the pixel, where the light was impinging. Conversely, as mentioned above in


Fig. 2, the introduction of microlenses again has an impact on the angular dependence of the quantum efficiency, which means that the back illuminated image sensors without microlenses have a larger independence of the incident angle, even better than the red curve in Fig. 2.


THE ANSWER Returning to the answer of our initial question, backside illuminated image sensors have fewer obstacles in the pathway of the incoming light as it reaches the volume of the pixel, where the conversion to charge carriers takes place. Terefore, backside illuminated CMOS image sensors are able to convert more of the light into charge carriers, resulting in larger signals and better images.


Fig. 4. Schematic cross section through a backside illuminated CMOS image sensor without (a) and with microlenses (b) to illustrate the microlens effect of improving the MTF


Dr Gerhard Holst is Head of Science & Research Business Development at PCO. www.pco.de


www.scientistlive.com xx 69


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72