Pumps, Valves & Liquid Handing High-precision liquid fl ow processes demand full fl uidic control Dr Fritiof Pontén, Biotech Fluidics AB, fritiof.ponten@biotechfl uidics.com


One of the most challenging aspects of achieving high precision in any type of fl uid fl ow process is to maintain meticulous control of the delivered volumes per time unit. Often this requires high-frequency supervision of the liquid stream to ensure that dissolved gases do not out-gas to form bubbles. This article discusses how to address these requirements with a set of powerful tools to monitor liquid fl ow rate on the millisecond timescale, and to remove dissolved gases well before they cause system pressure instability.


The solubility of gases in liquids is a fundamental topic. For instance, life in the ocean is entirely dependent on this phenomenon, and many people enjoy consuming sparkling beverages. In other situations, dissolved gases may cause us troubles by outgassing causing the formation of microbubbles or by the reactivity of the gases. Just as oxygen dissolved in water forms the basis of life in the sea, it also makes the water a corrosive environment through its oxidation potential. The dissolution of gases is inherently a dynamic process and there is no such thing as a bottle of fully degassed liquid. The solubility of gases depends on the type of gas and type of liquid, as well as most importantly the temperature and pressure of the system. In general, gas solubility in liquids decreases as the temperature increases, and when the pressure decreases. The infl uence of temperature and pressure on the solubility of air in water is shown in Figure 1.


Figure 2: Schematic of the gas permeable membrane within a degassing chamber connected to vacuum pump and controller (left), and a photo of the internal construction of an in-line vacuum degasser based on Tefl on™ AF membrane (right). The well-controlled vacuum in the degassing chamber provides the driving force for the dissolved gas to pass through the degassing membrane.


Figure 1. Solubility of air in water at different pressures as a function of temperature. The solubility of air decreases by approximately 40% on warming up a refrigerated solution to room temperature. Reduced pressure or negative pressure transients, frequently produced by pumps, reduces the solubility even further, resulting in outgassing and dispensing errors.


In industry and laboratory applications, dissolved gases can cause problems either by bubble formation, compromising the fl ow stability, or by the nature of the gas in question. Bubble formation by out-gassing occurs when the solubility limit of the gas is exceeded. This is a quick and dynamic process which often makes it diffi cult to detect as the bubbles formed can re-dissolve when the solubility increases again. Formation of microbubbles frequently occur at negative pressure transients, especially in pressurised systems, and at local hot spots. Blending solvents may also cause outgassing since the gas solubility in the mixture commonly is lower than in the individual solvents. One such example is the mixing of methanol and water that is well-known to result in outgassing. The release of energy from the formation of water-methanol hydrogen bonds in this mixture further accelerates the outgassing by increasing the solution temperature.


Widely used in industrial and laboratory applications to solve issues with outgassing and bubble formation, the DEGASi® line of highly effi cient in-line degassers has been proven to continuously reduce the dissolved gases well beyond the levels where formation of microbubble can occur. These degassers have been designed to meet the very stringent requirement of chemical compatibility with negligible material leakage and stable degassing performance, which is essential within chemical analysis such as HPLC. The action of gas permeable Tefl on™ AF membranes in these degassers is illustrated in Figure 2.


Secondary uptake of gases into a degassed liquid fl ow is sometimes overlooked even though this may have a signifi cant impact on overall degassing effi ciency. It is therefore also important to consider the choice of materials in your fl uidic system after the degassing step. To eliminate secondary gas uptake through the fl ow lines, gas permeable materials like silicone and PTFE must be avoided. This becomes even more important with longer system tubing. The recommended polymeric tubing materials to minimise secondary gas uptake are Fluorinated Ethylene Polypropylene (FEP), or even better, Tefzel® EFTE, combined with suitable fi ttings. By choosing the proper polymer- based tubing material, metal tubing can often be completely avoided, making fl uidic system assembly and future service very much easier.


In fl ow process applications, especially with several parallel or merging liquid fl ows, keeping fl ow rates accurate is critical to achieve the required high-precision results. Even using the best quality pumps, actual process fl ow rates may not be as reliably consistent as some pump suppliers might claim. Variation in delivered fl ow can arise because pumps are often calibrated under ideal conditions with pure solvents, while fl ow processing often involves quite concentrated solutions where viscosity may differ. Pump pulsation is also known to signifi cantly contribute to deviations in the fl uidic profi le and net process outcome.


The Biotech Liquid Flow Meter offers a solution to this issue by enabling monitoring of liquid fl ow rates with a resolution on the millisecond timescale. This convenient device is available in several varieties optimised for different fl ow rate ranges (from 10 nL/min up to 650 mL/min), all based on a sampling speed up to 13 Hz (78 ms). Its continuous read-out and computer-saved data can be used as feedback to fi ne-tune pump settings. This device, much like the degassers, is built to be entirely compatible with the fundamental principles of almost any chemistry. This ability to perform high-precision measurements of liquid fl ow rates at millisecond time resolution is creating a new understanding of how fl uidic systems work. This new high performance fl ow monitoring technology offers a lower priced alternative to Coriolis fl owmeter technology or manual approaches, which lack time resolution and absorb large amounts of technician time.


Summary


To ensure the high-precision liquid fl ow required by many analytical scientifi c instruments and fl uidic processing applications a new generation of high-performance degassers and real time liquid fl owmeters is necessary.


In-line degassers have been proven to continuously reduce the dissolved gases well beyond the levels where formation of microbubble can occur. Today, in-line degassers are available that meet the stringent requirement of chemical compatibility with negligible material leakage and stable degassing performance, which is essential with widely used techniques such as HPLC.


In liquid chromatography and fl uidic processes, maintaining fl ow rate accuracy is critical to achieving high-precision results. Signifi cant variation in delivered liquid fl ow from pumps can arise due to effects such as gas bubbles, dissolved gases, and pulsation.


A new generation of thermal fl owmeters offering the ability to perform high-precision measurement of liquid fl ow rates at millisecond time resolution is creating a new understanding of how fl uidic systems work. This new high performance fl ow monitoring technology offers a lower priced alternative to Coriolis fl owmeter technology or manual approaches, which lack time resolution and absorb large amounts of technician time.


Read, Share and Comment on this Article, visit: www.labmate-online.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68