search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Materials Applications


Determination of Mass Attenuation Coefficients of T, U, Np, and Pu for Oxygen Kα X-Rays Using an Electron Microprobe by P Pöml and X Llovet, Microsc Microanal | https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927620001282 Electron probe microanalysis


(EPMA) is an analytical


technique widely used for characterization of nuclear materials. However, accurate analysis of nuclear materials containing light elements (for example, C, N, O) is still difficult because of the large uncertainties affecting the mass attenuation coefficients (MACs) of Kα X-rays of light elements in actinide absorbers. In this study, we performed measurements of the MACs of T, U, Np, and Pu for O X-rays using a shielded electron microprobe. Te MACs were obtained by measuring, at varying accelerating voltages, relative X-ray intensities emitted from TO2 PuO2


, UO2 , NpO2 , and targets and processing them with the computer program


XMAC. Our results showed that the MACs implemented in the Monte Carlo simulation program PENELOPE, which are based on the photoionization cross-section calculations of Sabbatucci and Salvat (Rad Phys Chem 121 [2016] 122–40), provide the best agreement with our measurements (Figure). Te PENELOPE MACs consistently yielded accurate EPMA analysis of a uranium- doped americium oxide sample, which also contained Np and Pu.


Biological Applications


Confocal Analysis of Distribution and Persistence of Sindbis Virus (TaV-GFP) Infection in Midguts of Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes by JJ Saredy, FY Chim, ZL Lyski, YP Ahearn, and DF Bowers, Microsc Microanal | doi:10.1017/ S1431927620001270


Biological transmission of arthropod-borne-viruses


(arboviruses) to vertebrate hosts by hematophagous insects poses a global threat because such arboviruses can result in a range of serious public health infectious diseases. Female mosquitoes were fed blood containing a virus reporter, SINV (Tosea asigna Virus [TaV]-GFP) that produces green fluorescent protein (GFP) in infected cells. Te posterior midgut (PMG), an integral organ of transmission, must be breeched before the virus can disseminate to potentially infect the mosquito salivary glands for transmission to vertebrates. Infected PMGs were dissected from viremic blood-fed mosquitoes and labeled with primary antibodies against SINV antigens followed by a secondary antibody conjugated with Texas-red fluorochrome (Figure). Te detection of SINV antigens preceded the accumulation of reporter virus GFP. SINV-TaV-GFP was first observed in the PMG, the primary target tissue, at 3 days post-blood-feeding. Te virus was sequestered in circumscribed foci and replicated in PMG peristaltic muscles (secondary target tissue) following dissemination. GFP was observed to persist in PMGs for 30 days post-infection.


66 doi:10.1017/S1551929520000826


Comparison of tabulated MACs of actinide elements for O Kα X-rays. Solid lines are MAC tabulations from the literature; open circles are the experimental results of the present study. The accu- racy of the measured MACs is estimated to be better than 5%.


Merged image showing overlap of TX-red labeling of SINV antigens on outskirts of virus foci (arrows) and epithelial cells (arrowhead) prior to robust expression and accumulation of GFP. See Figures 5A and 5B in the published paper for single-channel images.


www.microscopy-today.com • 2020 May


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84