Agrochemicals: exciting technical challenges and new business opportunities

Agrochemicals consultant Dr Rob Bryant says keeping up with the demands of continuing developments in agrochemical science has been a prime driver for fine chemical companies and that the agrochemical industry continues to present exciting synthetic challenges for organic chemists


he development of the global fine chemical industry has taken place in partnership with many

downstream sectors. In terms of sales value, the agrochemical sector has remained the second most important bioscience- based industrial outlet (the pharmaceuticals sector being more valuable) for those companies offering competence in organic chemistry since the 1950s.

Keeping up with the demands of the continuing developments in agrochemical science has been a prime driver for fine chemical companies, be it in novel raw materials, the latest breakthroughs in synthetic techniques, or the changing demands for novel structural elements. This last topic will be covered In this short review, which will borrow from an annual review of new agrochemical actives and biologicals that began in 1982, the Ag Chem New Compound Review.

At the time of launching by an Elanco sales and marketing director, Bill Hopkins, this review was in fact a round-up of the

information that was pooled from direct reports from the leading research and development groups around the world. Such openness has become uncommon these days, alas, and the collection of new agrochemical leads gradually declined during the period 2005- 2010, probably as a result of the increasing costs of getting new chemistries approved and launched. The need for managing investor-expectations was another regrettable factor in this reduction of industry co-operation. In spite of greater challenges needed to continue the report’s annual publications, it has continued to offer a useful insight into the new technologies being adopted by the market. From the perspective of companies hoping to offer their services to the agrochemical industry, the report offers a valuable source of the new active ingredients and (indirectly) intermediates for which supply contracts might become available. This review, principally intended for organic chemists, examines the main structural elements currently being included in new agrochemical actives. In order to

set the scene, Table 1 offers a historical summary of a range of chemical features (“chemistries”) that have been important during the period 1950-2021.

Chemical classes of continuing/increasing importance In the latest volume of the Ag Chem New Compound Review, 251 chemical actives are listed. These compounds have reached active development (beyond greenhouse tests), have been awarded recent approvals, or have just been launched (there are another 74 biologicals, mainly insect predators or microorganisms).

The more common molecular classes of industrial organic compounds are presented in Table 1. The numbers of commercial agrochemical actives featuring each one, together with their earliest and latest use, is shown, demonstrating their utility. A few comments on the leading classes help to illustrate the reasons for their incorporation into so many compounds. Figure 1 shows four of these structures. • The importance of fluorine as a molecular feature in agrochemicals cannot be over-

exaggerated. The improved lipid solubility of organofluorines is just as important to medicinal chemists developing pharmaceutical actives. This year’s report (Volume 39) profiles over 50 compounds that contain at least one fluorinated moeity. Many include polyfluorinated substituents, the technologies for which have been created to accommodate demand created by the agrochemical research community.

• Pyrimidines continue to be a favourite structural feature, with 15 appearing in Volume 39. UST East China has a plant disease resistance inducer in development that combines a pyrimidine and pyrazole (as well as a substituted fluorophenyl group).

• Pyridines offer an attractive aromatic ring, which (unlike benzene) has basic properties and thus enables a combination of a hydrophobic site close to a basic point of co-ordination (this is useful in maximizing the fit with the enzyme receptor site being targeted). Many active ingredients are made using pyridine or a picoline (one of the three methylpyridines) as the ultimate

Table 1: Historical summary of a range of molecular features (‘chemistries’) important in agrochemical actives (1960-2021)

14 March/April 2021 • Issue 2

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64