search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS


57


Mapei strengthens expectations in University of Essex structural repair


Colchester. The Reinforced Concrete framed podium that provides a link between the university buildings and a roof to the service roads at lower ground was partially demolished, with the remnants of the podium being reused with a new building structure. In a structural survey commissioned by the University, and undertaken by engineers Mason Navarro Pledge (MNP), it was concluded that the second beam required strengthening to support loads that would be applied in a permanent state due to the heavy use of the link bridge. The beam showed signs of significant corrosion at the support of the existing footbridge, and the columns had areas with steel corrosion and delamination of concrete due to low concrete cover. Working hand in hand with engineers


M


and specialist contractors Cemplas Waterproofing and Concrete Repairs Ltd, Mapei proposed a complete Concrete Repair and Protection solution in accordance with TR55, Design Guidance for Strengthening Concrete Structures using Carbon Fibre Composite Materials. Cemplas Waterproofing and Concrete


Repairs Ltd completed the works to a very tight schedule thanks to the Fast Track nature of the materials used on site; during the


apei products have been specified for a structural repair project at the University of Essex in


project, a total of three Mapei systems were used for concrete repairs, structural strengthening and protection.


Concrete Repairs: The concrete was found to be badly deteriorated in certain areas of the beam, and the columns had areas where the concrete had spalled due to corrosion of the reinforcement steel caused by low concrete cover. Mapei recommended removing the deteriorated concrete and then cleaning the steel prior to the application of Mapefer 1K, a one- component corrosion-inhibiting protective mortar for the reinforcing steel. The beam was then repaired with Mapemortar HB R3, a high build thixotropic mortar which can be applied on vertical and overhead situations without formwork to a depth of up to 70mm per layer. The columns were repaired with the structural rapid-setting, thixotropic fibre- reinforced mortar Planitop Smooth & Repair R4 which can be applied between 3mm and 40mm in depth.


Structural Strengthening: After repairing the beam, it was prepared by rounding the corners. An even coat of Mapewrap Primer 1 was applied to the concrete surface, and whilst still fresh, Mapewrap 31 – the two-component, medium viscosity epoxy resin was applied. Mapewrap


C UNI-AX HM 600, a high-strength, unidirectional carbon fibre fabric with high modulus of elasticity, was laid into the Mapewrap 31, which impregnated and bonded the fabric. Alternate layers of Mapewrap 31 and Mapewrap C UNI-AX HM 600 were applied until the correct build up was achieved to meet the Strengthening design. Once the final layer of Mapewrap 31 was applied, Quartz sand was broadcasted in to the wet resin to provide a key for the protective covering system to be applied on top.


Protective System: Mapelastic Guard, a protective two- component, flexible cementitious mortar was applied to provide an effective protection for a 50-year design life. It was the ideal choice for the engineer as it protects the concrete against the penetration of aggressive atmospheric agents that can lead to corrosion, and protects the concrete in areas of low cover as a 2mm coating of Mapelastic Guard corresponds to 30mm concrete cover. In addition, it helps to protect the Mapewrap C UNI-AX HM 600, and because of its light grey colour gives a uniformed concrete appearance, blending the repair into the building.


0121 508 6970 www.mapei.co.uk


ADF SEPTEMBER 2019


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108