search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
111 I


It’s Show Time, Folks Garden design


t’s that time of year again when garden designers get over excited and hyper- ventilate a little. Well, I do anyway. I am


referring to the glorious madness that is the Chelsea Flower Show. In pursuit of inspiration (and cake


obviously), I made my annual pilgrim- age to check out the design zeitgeist. This year was particularly interest- ing and I got the impression that the ethos behind at lot of the gardens has shifted. At the risk of being a smarty- pants I would refer you back to one of my recent articles that I wrote about the importance of the colour green. Green was the overwhelming first


impression in a lot of the gardens. Many designers seem to have shifted their focus away from flowers and


Green


because they come in a huge variety of shapes and sizes and are great for adding structure and winter interest. In line with the problems now associated with box the topiary on show tended to be yew and not clipped to within an inch of its life. Overall the planting schemes


was the overwhelming


bright colours and onto foliage; using size, texture and shades of green to give in- terest. Those colours that were used were much softer and more subtle than those used in recent years. There were some particularly lovely combinations using pale yellows with whites and flashes of blue. Other colours that were used were some- what reminiscent of faded Venetian tapestries such as dusky claret, soft pink and bronze, copper, purple and old gold. Another notable feature was the


use of trees. This year there were trees in abundance with lots of different species. Conifers have also made a triumphant return, which is good


first impression in a lot of the gardens.


were subtle and understated. There was imperfection (á la Chelsea) and a much greater use of native or species vari- eties, together with large trees, which gave a lot of the gardens a


very beautiful and tranquil feel. The hard landscaping also followed this more naturalistic approach with a lot of very raw materials in evidence. There was rustic wood, log walls, chunky stone terraces and paths made from crushed concrete, gravel or simply trampled soil. I appreciate that a lot of people


feel that Chelsea gardens are not achievable in the real world and I would agree completely. Of course they aren’t. It is theatre, smoke and mirrors, show time. However there were some beautiful elements that would certainly translate into reality.


colette@charsleydesign.com www.charsleydesign.com t: 01548 581753 m: 07774 827799 Follow me on Twitter @ColetteCharsley • Instagram colettecharsley Professional Landscape & Garden Design


Creative and beautiful designs for village, town and country gardens


Colette Charsley PG Dip OCGD t: 01548 581753 m: 07774 827799


colette@charsleydesign.com www.charsleydesign.com


by Colette Charsley


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140