Practial Tips For Beginning Music Teacher Mentoring
Jennifer L. R. Greene, Fayetteville-Manius School, NY Christopher M. Baumgartner, University of Oklahoma Edward C. Hoffman III, University of Montevallo
novice music teachers also must focus on their own contin- ued learning and professional growth. Having a mentor who understands how beginning teachers think and develop can impact how new teachers strategize solutions to a variety of issues during their first years. The Supporting Beginning Mu- sic Teachers ASPA (Area of Strategic Planning and Action)—a workgroup of P-12 and higher education music teachers from the Society for Music Teacher Education (SMTE)—focuses their efforts on describing “effective models of mentoring, induction, professional development, and continued support programs for new music teachers” (http://smte. us/aspas/sup- porting-beginning-music-teachers/). As part of this mission, we offer a window into the developmental stages of beginning teachers so that experienced music educators can effectively mentor the next generation of music teachers. One of the most prominently-researched developmental theories in music education is the teacher concerns model proposed by Fuller and Bown (1975). As suggested by this model, teachers move through three concern-based stages (self, task, impact) as they experience teaching for the first time. Although these concerns appear in distinct stages, teach- ers may progress (and regress) at varying rates, especially when they encounter new situations. Additionally, it is important to understand that these developmental stages are not discrete, but may overlap, occur simultaneously, and/or flow back and forth throughout a beginning teacher’s initial years. Recogniz- ing these varying concerns will allow mentors to tailor their support to best assist mentees in progressing toward the final stage of teacher development. An awareness of the issues common among new teachers may allow mentors to assist their mentees in moving more
B TEMPO 44
eginning a teaching career as a music educator is an exciting endeavor. Despite an overwhelming enthusiasm to begin work in the school classroom,
quickly through the first stage of concerns (Holson & Heyse, 1990). “Do I belong here? Am I capable enough to teach these students?” Questions like these reflect this initial stage of self- concerns (Fuller & Bown, 1975). A certain empathy might be fostered if mentors reflected upon and revisited their own first years of teaching. By sharing stories of their own early experiences, mentors might better develop a sense of trust and understanding with their mentees, helping to ease men- tees concerns and opening a reciprocal dialogue. Isolation is a particular issue for many music educators—having someone who has “been there” and understands the problems and pit- falls often encountered in early-career teaching may provide unique and specialized support for beginning music teachers. We suggest meeting outside the school environment (e.g., cof- fee shop) to foster this type of non-judgmental relationship between mentor-mentee pairs in a more relaxed atmosphere. Once past the early concerns about themselves, new teach-
ers may have a tendency to focus on task-oriented concerns (Holson & Heyse, 1990). During this second stage of Fuller and Bown’s (1975) proposed development, beginning educa- tors ask questions such as “How do I teach this concept?” or “How can I maintain class control?” Considering the ever- changing landscape of education, day-to-day teaching may seem at times overwhelming for early-career music teachers. Some novices also may be teaching outside their concentration area (e.g., band directors teaching choir), adding to the level of task-oriented concerns. Music mentors might best assist these and all new teachers by helping mentees prioritize the issues at hand—in particular, helping mentees navigate between the curricular/peda-gogical goals (in the classroom) and adminis- trative/ procedural tasks (outside the classroom). The former would be best supported by a music-specific mentor, and the latter a building-specific mentor. If an in-house music men- tor is unavailable, it might be beneficial for a mentee to have
MARCH 2018
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68