search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEALTH & SAFETY - WORKWEAR


SAVINGS WITHOUT COMPROMISE


How Personal Protective Equipment cost savings can be achieved without compromising on protection


With procurement managers constantly tasked with decreasing spend and finding enhanced value for money, Andrew Egerton, Senior Group Health and Safety Category Manager at Buck & Hickman, looks at best practice surrounding the selection and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in wind energy facilities. He also explains how it is still possible to achieve cost savings while maintaining correct protection for employees.


RESPONSIBILITY


In a typical manufacturing environment, workers will need a variety of PPE to guard against occupational hazards. Under the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Management of Health and Safety at work regulations 1999, it is the employer’s responsibility to not only provide PPE, but to ensure its workers are properly trained in its use – all of which adds up to a considerable but unavoidable expense, however these costs can be safely reduced.


CORRECT SPECIFICATION


The first stage in rationalising the use of PPE, with a view to identifying cost saving opportunities, is in the specification of the correct equipment. PPE is frequently


over-specified, with the maximum level of protection often selected regardless of the hazard. In reality, what is appropriate in one section of a wind energy facility may be excessive or even unnecessary in a lower-risk area. One of the most frequent reasons given for the non-use of PPE is that it’s not compatible with other protection that must be worn. Incompatible PPE is not only less likely to be worn, with individuals removing items in frustration, creating a safety risk, but may also be more susceptible to damage. For example, the hearing protection seal can be broken by wearing eyewear and therefore the ear protectors don’t provide the correct SNR as stated on the product.


CONSIDERATIONS


It is important to note that a higher cost does not always mean a greater level of protection. Q-Safe, a comprehensive range of PPE exclusive to Buck & Hickman, has achieved CE marking for all its products and is compliant with all relevant European health & safety and quality standards. The range comprises more than 80 different products, covering head, hand, eye, ear and respiratory protection as well as short-life clothing including coveralls, overshoes and aprons.


IT IS IMPORTANT TO


NOTE THAT A HIGHER COST DOES NOT ALWAYS MEAN A GREATER LEVEL OF PROTECTION


TRAINING


Once the correct PPE has been supplied to employees, it is important to make sure they continue to work safely, and managers should train their staff on how to use the equipment and the repercussions of not doing so.


Buck & Hickman SCAN/CLICK


MORE INFO


26


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76