I
n Sacramento, California, the Twin Rivers, Elk Grove and Sacramento City Unified School Districts are receiving 29 total electric school buses along with associated charging infrastructure Twin Rivers Unified School District is upbeat about the purchase. It will bring buses with zero emissions against the new federal regulations as well as the tough state requirements of California. Tim Hooks, di- rector of transportation for Twin Rivers, said the district is receiving a total of 16 electric school buses, with eight already in the fleet. Te first eight are eLion all-electric school buses manufactured by Canadian company Lion Bus. Te remainder are TransTech Type-A school buses with electric drives provided by Motiv Power Systems. “Currently we have a temporary
infrastructure that will charge five buses at a time,” he added. “We are working with our local power company to upgrade infrastructure.” Funded in-part by a grant from the California Air Resources Board, the project is touted as the largest U.S. deployment of zero-emission school buses to date, to pro- vide sustainable transportation and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is representative of what the industry is likely to see more of over the next decade as manufacturers, deal- ers, technology providers and school trans- porters respond to the impending Phase 2 federal Greenhouse Gas Emission regula- tions, which, barring any governmental delay or repeal, target a reduction in NOx emissions to the 0.02 g/bhp-hr standard. It is set to go into effect in next year. Te regulations aim to achieve long- standing goals to lower overall emissions from diesel engines. In short, Phase 2 mandates manufacturers and dealers of buses and associated technology to offer
the specified power of the bus with more efficient and clean technology. Technologies have been introduced to use less fuel, burn cleaner alternative fuels, or consume no fuel at all via electric power. Te regulation took effect by executive
order of President Obama. However, the possibility exists that it could be repealed by the new administration. President Trump ordered a review of fuel efficiency standards for cars in mid-March, implying that such regulation serves as an obstacle to automo- bile manufacturing and jobs.
FOOTING THE BILL For schools, however, new technology and especially new buses are costly. Fund- ing assistance for new technology and new assets, though limited, is available from several sources. Joe Annotti is a consultant with Gladstein,
Neandross and Associates, which specializes in market development for low-emission and alternative fuel vehicle technologies, infrastructure and fuels for both on- and off-road applications. Annotti, a former U.S. EPA staffer who was a chief architect of the National Clean Diesel Rebate Program, speaks of two principal sources of funding to replace aging buses. Te Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) was passed by Congress as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 with the goal of reducing diesel exhaust from older engines used in on- and non-road vehicles, including trucks, school buses, marine engines, construction equipment, and locomotives, among others. It currently allocates about $11 million for emissions reduction project and the House Appropri- ations Committee approved a 20-percent hike for FY 2017. Te DERA program operates under
Joe Annotti was a chief architect of the National Clean Diesel Rebate Program and is now a consultant to a variety of companies on obtaining low-emissions and clean- fuel grants. He presents a webinar this month for School Transportation News on the VW Mitigation Trust Fund as well as other existing emissions- reduction programs, such as DERA. Learn more on our Webinars page at
stnonline.com/ conferences/ webinars.
www.stnonline.com 47
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92
