search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FIRST TAKE Anatomy of Media (Non) Bias WRITTEN BY RYAN GRAY | RYAN@STNONLINE.COM T


he “Making the Grade” segment produced for PBS by Education Week that aired May 16 dove into the murky waters of three-point, lap- shoulder restraint systems. If you have yet to


watch it, visit stnonline.com/go/9r. If you have already seen it, take a another look, and read our account starting on page 28. No matter where you fall on the debate spectrum, it


is hard to argue that the segment wasn’t as nuanced and balanced as we’ve seen the mainstream media handle one of the most nuanced student transportation issues, and in just under 7 minutes no less. More on that in a bit. Proponents were buoyed by the demonstration of crash test videos that show how lap-shoulder belts provide the most complete passenger protection in various crash scenarios. Opponents were encouraged by Education Week correspondent Lisa Stark, a veteran television journalist of ABC News fame, discussing the challenges of requiring students to wear the restraints and, more importantly, the indelible price tag to districts. Making that very point was Todd Watkins, director of transportation for Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland. Watkins, a 21-year industry veteran with an additional


dozen years of shuttle transportation and commercial vehicle safety experience with the University of Maryland, is as professional and knowledgeable as they come. Tere is absolutely no doubt in my mind that he spoke from the heart when he told her that he can’t justify the $1-million cost per year of adding seat belts to the district’s school buses. And, yes, he added, that is an extremely tough sell to parents. But he’s a true believer, as he should be, that school buses are the safest vehicle, bar none, and his bud- get is better spent on other areas of student safety. As Stark reported, in all those years at Montgomery


County Watkins and his team have never suffered a fatal school bus crash. By the grace of God, one might re- spond. True, none of us should ever be so self-confident to utter aloud the words, “Tat would never happen to me,” which can be a literal kiss of death for student transporters. But the truth of the matter is that student transporters make extremely difficult decisions every day when presented with limited funds and a laundry list of growing needs. For all the reasons that the industry has volleyed back


12 School Transportation News • JUNE 2017


and forth for decades, one could argue that “Making the Grade” omitted very real fears about what effect occupant restraint systems might have on emergency evacuations or reduced passenger capacity. I asked Stark this very question. Now remember, Stark and her team whittled down


this extremely complex issue into a package about twice as long as an average television commercial break. You try that the next time your next door neighbor flags you down in the driveway. “You’re right it’s hard to fit in ev- erything,” she responded. “Our research seemed to show the capacity issue was a non-starter these days, given the new three-point belt technology and the ability use the belts and still put three younger students in the seats.” When was the last time you heard a mainstream


reporter so succinctly explain 3-2 seating? “As for the evacuation issue, we found no definitive


answers,” she continued. “Te NTSB indicated that evacuation is enhanced with belts because students are more likely to stay conscious and self-evacuate. Tose against belts argue there are no good studies to answer the evacuation question definitively, which is true. “So, given the time constraints and our reporting, we decided not to focus on those two issues. But we certain- ly considered them as we were crafting that story.” And as we know, there so many more issues to discuss that a two-hour feature documentary would be chal- lenged to adequately cover them all. Tat’s where School Transportation News and the STN EXPO come in. No, we’re not getting into the documentary game—yet, anyway—but next month in Reno we’ll be fielding our latest panel of student transporters who will speak to how and why they moved toward three-point systems. Last year, Kris Hafezizadeh, the director of transportation for Austin ISD in Texas, sat on a similar panel to discuss lap- shoulder belts in his school buses, as he did with Stark for “Making the Grade.” Actual experience with three-point belts speaks volumes as do concerns from practitioners. I hope you’ll be in attendance to hear and contribute to the conversation. ●


Ryan Gray, Editor-in-Chief


CELEBRATING25YEARS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92