This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RANCHING Business


that report. For many producers, their primary questions can be answered by accumulating and analyzing 2 or 3 key pieces of data.” For example, one of the key


indicators of profi tability is per- cent weaned calf crop. To generate that number, an


Good records also help producers to spot


trends, pinpoint cyclical changes and see things realistically.


operation would need to document the number of cows exposed to bulls during the breeding season and the number of calves weaned from that breeding. (A pro- ducer would need records from 2 calendar years be- cause of 15- to 18-month elapses between conception and weaning for a typical cow-calf operation.) A good target for a cow-calf producer would be 85 to 90 percent. “There is no one-size-fi ts-all record keeping system,”


Swigert says. “Producers need to commit to collecting and analyzing the information that matters most to them. Otherwise, they get disillusioned and the infor- mation sits unused.” With that said, a good starting point on the produc-


tion side is a complete inventory. The inventory should include a list of cattle by class, feed, equipment and land. While inventorying cattle once a year is adequate, it’s better to inventory twice, once at the beginning of the fi scal year and once at the beginning of the breeding season. The cattle inventory should include a record of all deaths, purchases, and sales of both raised and purchased animals. “Many producers think that they can keep track of


the number of animals on their places in their heads, but actually less than half of the producers know with certainty the number of cows they have this year ver- sus last year if they don’t write it down,” Swigert says. “A good inventory is a key to being able to determine profi tability.” Additional basic pieces of production data include


weaning weight, sale weight and number of grazing acres.


More than just the Schedule F On the fi nancial side, many producers operate using


their Schedule F as their primary source of fi nancial information, he says. “In my 25-year career, probably less than half of


the producers I’ve worked with have had more than their Schedule F fi nancial information when we fi rst meet,” Swigert says. “At best, Schedule F is a basic income and expense


80 The Cattleman February 2015 Learn more about this topic at the


2015 Cattle Raisers Convention March 27 to 29, Fort Worth.


thecattlemanmagazine.com


statement that has been infl u- enced by IRS tax considerations. It doesn’t measure the profit- ability or fi nancial position of a business.” To measure profi tability and


position, the Farm Financial Standards Guidelines suggest that producers have a balance


sheet with both cost and market valuation; accrual adjusted income statement; cash fl ow statement; and owner equity statement. This information is generated by combining informa-


tion from the producer’s inventory and cash accounting system. Accountants can help set up the cash account- ing system, either by using computer programs such as Quicken or QuickBooks, or in a general ledger. They can also help generate the reports. On the production side, records can be computerized


using a program such as Cattle Max, or they, too, can be kept by hand in a ledger or in an Excel spreadsheet. Computerization makes it easier to compare records across the years, but it is not necessary for success, Swigert says. “At the Noble Foundation, our Outstanding Coop-


erator Award is named after the late Leonard Wyatt,” says Swigert. “He kept the best, most useful records I have ever seen — and he did it all by hand.”


Your information helps with your decisions The key is not how the records are kept, but how


they are used. Gathering the information isn’t helpful unless the data is analyzed and used to make deci- sions, Swigert says. Sometimes producers aren’t sure how to proceed


with the analysis. In those cases, it can be helpful to have the expertise of advisors from organizations such as the Noble Foundation or the Extension Service. “Outside advisors have the benefi t of objectivity and


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124