This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
SHOP SOLUTIONS Continued from P52


“Laser technology produces lots of little details while maintaining a high polish on the areas between the features of the lens tooling,” said Melonio. “That’s not possible using chemical etching because those areas would have to be sandblasted to clean them after the process. So, laser textur- ing is a big deal for the lens manufacturers. It offers them another option besides electrical discharge machining when it comes to creating a lot of features in lens molds while maintaining a high polish between those features.” “One of the biggest issues with conventional texturing is that automotive engineers believe all the tools—for example for interior components—for a single model car, need to be sourced from one supplier. The concern is that tools textured by different suppliers will vary and lack consistency,” said Melonio. As a result, shops that perform texturing have what are known as “harmony rooms” for checking gloss, texture, and other attributes of fi nished components. “But if you generate that pattern on a laser machine any- where in the world, it will be spot-on in terms of texture, gloss


and other characteristics. And as a manufacturer you can then source tools anywhere in the world and be confi dent they will match perfectly,” Melonio said. “A company that is sourcing tools to Asia, Europe and the US, for example, can send the same texture pattern information to all its suppliers. The tex- ture of all the tooling will match no matter where it’s produced. While much of the work on the large laser-texturing system is automotive-related, Custom Etch’s philosophy is to maintain a diverse customer base, which means the machine also processes components for a number of other applica- tions. These include large molds for recreational vehicles, building trades, aerospace and medical components. For more information from GF Machining Solutions, go to


www.gfms.com/us, or phone 847-913-5300. Continued from P45


HBA Inserts are Cost Cutters for Hard Metals


A


s part of its Lean Manufacturing Initiative, Mike Alfonso, president, Grand Traverse Machine (GTM; Traverse


City, MI) established a regular Thursday morning meeting to discuss tooling issues and opportunities. The family-owned shop specializes in high-precision manufacturing applications and has grown from a three-man operation in a 2000 ft2 m2) facility in 1966 to a 29,000 ft2


(185 (2694-m2 ) plant employing


70 people on two shifts seven days a week. “Our customer base is extremely diversifi ed and we run everything from automotive production components to military parts to hydraulic cylinders,” said Alfonso. “Work- ing with so many different materials, including some of the latest alloys, we realized that it was critical to get a handle on our tooling costs and performance. This could only happen through a regular disciplined approach. So we set aside Thursday mornings to discuss our existing and future requirements from a price/value standpoint. As a result, we frequently run formal tests that compare price and capabili- ties from various tooling manufacturers.” Tests conducted by Paul Biegel, GTM lathe department


supervisor, demonstrate the success of that approach. One test involved turning a ball nut 1.5” (38 mm) in length for a leadscrew 3.137-12 UNS-3A thread. The material was 8620 steel hardened throughout to Rc


26–32. Adding to the chal-


lenge, it was also an interrupted cut, as it had a 6-32 cross hole in two places.


118 AdvancedManufacturing.org | February 2015


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140