This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Net Generaon of Electricity by Wind Power


40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000


20,000 0


2000


2001


2002


2003


2004


2005


2006


In December 2015, Congress extended both credits: the PTC has been retroactively applied to 2015 and extended to 2016, while the ITC at current rates has been extended to 2019. Unless revisions are made over the next couple of years, which could very well happen, these incentives will be phased out incrementally thereafter.


In the boldest commitment to date at the federal level, the Clean Power Plan was introduced in summer 2015. By 2030 the plan aims to cut carbon emissions from the power sector by 32% below 2005 levels. It allows states to choose how they meet EPA-mandated individual targets. If upheld by the courts, the CPP is expected to accelerate wind and solar developments across the country: an incentive pro- gram is in place to grant credits to states that invest early in renewable sources.


State-level policies include renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and fi nancing programs such as power purchase agreements, rebates, and grants. RPS mechanisms require electricity retailers to offer a certain percentage of power gen- erated from renewable sources. Introduced in the late 1990s and early 2000s, RPS are currently in place in 29 states and the District of Columbia. These targets usually increase over time and vary widely between states. For example, Hawaii has the most aggressive target, aiming to generate 100% of its energy needs from renewable sources by 2045.


Looking Ahead The momentum that has accompanied solar and wind en-


ergy growth over the past decade still faces a number of is- sues. Solar and wind are considered variable energy sources,


2007


2008


2009


2010


2011


2012


2013


2014


as their availability depends on the amount of sun shining or the amount of wind blowing. Variability makes integration into existing power grids diffi cult because initial grid design relied on a steady fl ow of generation. Fluctuations in solar and wind also make it diffi cult for generators to predict and balance output. Additionally, the National Renewable Energy Labora- tory (NREL) fi nds that greater renewable energy additions come with a unique economic barrier: at a certain point, solar and wind are no longer economically competitive or desirable to the system. The idea—called the economic carrying ca- pacity—is understood from the perspective of power owners. It suggests that with high rates of penetration, these energy sources drive down average market prices below what the producers want during peak demand. As Alex Trembath and Jesse Jenkins of the Breakthrough Institute note, the mar- ginal value of variable renewable energy declines as penetra- tion increases. These challenges have ignited research in grid management, storage technology, and demand response. The patchwork of state and federal policies that exist today points to the lack of coordinated national energy policy, another potential roadblock to scaling renewable energy more quickly. As Yale Law Professor E. Donald Elliott argues, this is due to structural factors such as the fragmented nature of energy and utilities governance, including the line be- tween state and federal oversight. The lack of a national RPS mechanism is a testament to this, as is the handful of states that have no renewable targets at all. As another example, at the time of writing, the Supreme Court temporarily suspend- ed Clean Power Plan, citing uncertainty about the legality of EPA’s ability to obligate states to emission targets.


11 — Energy Manufacturing 2016


MW / hr


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186