search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
YEARS


Sponsored by Climalife


Chiller O


CO2 Chiller


Greencold in association with Advansor of the year


ur client is a world leader in innovative packaging products for all industry, whose business


operation has a heavy demand for production machinery cooling, writes Greencold. This cooling load has historically been satisfied by several existing chiller systems, which were now reaching the end of their reliable working life. We were approached by the client for


our proposals to replace their existing plant with more efficient and environmentally sustainable new equipment, to become their main chiller base cooling load on site. The existing plant installation comprised


two rather old Industrial Frigo units (R407C), one very old F&R chiller (R422D) and a more recent twin compressor pack (R134a). All units had been progressively connected to a single centralised water buffer tank system as site cooling requirements expanded to form a common chilled water ring main serving the factory’s many packaging material manufacturing machines. The client’s initial requirement was for


new water chiller of 300 kW cooling capacity with water flow conditions of 12°C inlet and 7°C outlet, to be provided by cooling equipment which used a non-HFC, low global warming effect refrigerant, but with good energy efficiency. The client was aware that there may be an


increase capital expenditure required for a more environmentally friendly chiller system choice; they were however prepared to make that additional investment to achieve a more sustainable installation for the


future. At Greencold we made the point to the client that although they could expect the capital cost of such a chiller installation to be more expensive than an HFC unit alternative, with a careful design approach significant seasonal operational savings can be easily achieved. Indeed, with the added system efficiency during the winter months and the reduced overall energy consumption, such a new chiller unit using CO2


refrigerant would be


expected to accomplish a full payback of the additional capital cost differential perhaps in one year of plant operation. The installation was duly carried out


recently and the new CO2 chiller was installed


on to the existing factory ring main system alongside the existing plant, which allowed direct operational energy comparisons to be made, before the existing plants are retired from service. The new CO2


chiller was


carefully brought online mid-way through a full production day’s cooling load, and with site full cooling load progressively transferred to the single new CO2


chiller unit as


the existing chillers were removed from service. An instant drop in the site chiller energy input in the order of 30% was clearly seen on the client’s energy recording equipment, providing the client with the operation savings levels as predicted.


Dominic Holland (left) with Anders Monsted, Simon Andrew and Vanessa Smith from Greencold and Allan Harper (far right) from sponsor Climalife.


40 May 2022


www.acrnewsawards.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64