search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
AIR CONDITIONING The spirit of F-Gas


Air conditioning has become an essential part of today’s commercial life and it is now taken for granted that a modern office block or commercial property will have some form of air conditioning in place. Phil Ord, head of marketing and sales strategy at Mitsubishi Electric UK looks at how R32 fits into the picture.


T


oday’s systems offer a highly effective way of delivering energy efficient cooling and heating. These intelligent and automated units can cool down our buildings to counter the excess heat produced by IT equipment, while also making sure the office offers comfort levels that enable employees to work at their highest function.


As a manufacturer, we continue to refine our systems helping them become more energy efficient, more powerful and more controllable and at the heart of the current debate within the industry is the choice of refrigerant used within the systems. By now, we all know the reasons behind the move from R410a refrigerant to R32, not least of which is the significant drop in global warming potential (GWP) from one to the other.


This is because, despite the best efforts of everyone involved, there remains a potential for refrigerant leakage and emissions can occur during installation, commissioning and ongoing maintenance of equipment.


This is a major part of the reason that the EU introduced the original F-Gas Regulation in 2006 which focused on controlling emissions through improved quality of installations, refrigerant recovery and training.


A Direct Comparison


For anyone who has still to grasp the huge potential to be gained from switching from R410a to R32, there is a simple explanation which illustrates what the ‘spirit of the F-Gas Regulations’.


For the sake of argument, let’s take an assumed figure of one million tonnes of refrigerant currently in the UK market inside hermetically sealed direct expansion units. This allows us to see a direct comparison between R410A and R32 and demonstrate the importance of this transition to the industry.


26 February 2020


To keep the numbers simple to calculate, if we assume a leakage rate of 1% from these one million tonnes, this would mean 10,000 tonnes of R410A being released into the atmosphere.


When the refrigerant is inside the sealed system the global warming ‘potential’ is 2,088, but once it has been released this becomes the global warming ‘impact’ and in the case of R410A, the impact would be 20.8 million tonnes of CO2


equivalent (10,000 tonnes x 2,088 GWP).


With R32, the 1% leakage rate from one million tonnes still results in 10,000 tonnes being released into the atmosphere. However, now the GWP has been significantly lowered from 2,088 to 675. This means that the global warming ‘impact’ of R32 would be 6.75 million tonnes compared to 20.8 million tonnes with R410A.


That is a reduction of over 300% regardless of the figures used in the calculation. The tonnes may change, but the GWP figures for both refrigerants are constant and the percentage improvement from the use of R32 is also constant.


For me, that is why the transition to R32 is so timely and is another step on the road to even lower GWP, especially when less refrigerant is needed within each comparable system.


It all starts with training


One of the most important areas to help the industry reduce any potential for leakage has to be training and it is now mandatory for anyone working with refrigerants to get F-Gas certification from Refcom – an industry leading provider of F-Gas certification training.


This verifies that someone is competent to install, commission, decommission or maintain a system containing refrigerant and that they are qualified in the safe handling of refrigerants and environmentally aware of the proper, auditable procedures.


www.acr-news.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76