search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
up’ approach, of collect the information, then tick boxes and create reports. It is better to have five page reports that everyone understands, he said, than ‘thousands of check- box reports that no one reads’. To support this, he foresaw a horizontal framework of data models and datamarts – ‘this is the era of the datamart’ – but without institutions embarking on massive data manipulation and not understanding what they want to do with the data. He pointed out that anyone who had not addressed Basel II was not going to be able to wriggle off the hook. ‘The point is that Basel III isn’t dismissing Basel II, it is building on top, so you can’t go without it.’ In fact, Onorato argued that, while Basel III was a significant improvement over Basel II, it could actually compound the silo-based approach to risk management. There are two objectives: to avoid creating bubbles – particularly credit bubbles – during boom times, and to ‘turn down the volume’ during tough times. ‘Most of all, there are business model implications, with substantial governance and organisational implications.’ The ethos that investment banks should be self-funding will have ‘deep, far-reaching business implications’. However, will Basel III really break down the decentralised IT functions that support finance, treasury, business lines and risk management? The silo approach to risk had been tremendously misleading, felt Onorato. What is needed is a significant investment in infrastructure. There has been some breaking down of silos, particularly with market and credit risk coming together in the last few years, through drivers such as the Basel-derived Incremental Risk Charge and centralised Credit Value Adjustment (CVA) desk with profit and loss responsibility. And operational risk has tended to move under the auspices of market risk. However, the underlying business systems tend to remain detached. A written response to Basel III from Algorithmics concluded: ‘As trading and


structured finance has become more spread out and complex, the corporate structure of banks has also become more complex, such that different parts of the business run their own profit and loss books. This has generally made it harder for managers at the top to have an all-encompassing view of the risks on the group’s balance sheet.’ It seems clear that many banks’ reaction to Basel II was to build enterprise data warehouses with information brought together at the reporting stage, often with manual intervention to meet the Accord’s regulatory and management reporting requirements. The warehouses were expanded to cover credit and economic capital, with separate calculations for market risk and operational risk. ‘It was an add-on, on top of an add-on, on top of an add-on,’ said Onorato. He argues that Basel III falls into the same trap, compartmentalising risk, as reflected in separate stress tests for liquidity and capital. The high-profile stress tests in the summer only focused on capital levels, not liquidity risk. ‘But the crisis came from liquidity, and some well capitalised banks went under.’ Advice from Mikael Sorboen at BNP Paribas was that banks should view all of this as a chance to simplify. They ‘need to make decisions about how to blend real-time processing with end-of-day’. The requires a lot of organisation and architecture changes. ‘It is not just adding a jet engine on the back of your current systems.’ The requirements continue to shift as more regulations emerge, so it is understandable that there are still uncertainties about the data and systems implications. Nevertheless, enough is known about the direction, while the timescales are sufficiently tight that investment and activity is needed if there is finally to be a widespread adoption of strategic data and risk solutions, plus long-awaited standards, rather than even more short-termism. This online guide looks at the issues, possible architectures and components, and then turns to some of the main suppliers of risk and financial accounting systems. Those suppliers have dedicated offerings so this guide does not include those systems that have broader functionality, such as the treasury and capital markets system suppliers (Calypso, Misys, Murex et al) and trading system suppliers, all of which are profiled in our Treasury & Capital Market Systems Market Report.


Risk Management Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 7


market overview


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192