search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Reveleus


Formed in 2002, and based on the Flexcube Information Center analytics solution, Reveleus was established as I-flex’s business intelligence and analytics division. The acquisition by I-flex in 2005 of the Ortos operational risk solution from Capco then enabled the vendor to broaden the capabilities of the Reveleus solution further. DBS Bank went live with this solution integrated within the Reveleus offering shortly afterwards. In early 2007, the Reveleus Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) framework was unveiled. This framework surrounds both


the Oracle Reveleus and Oracle Mantas risk and compliance ‘point’ solutions, providing an end-to-end GRC solution. Mantas was an AML and compliance software vendor which was acquired by I-flex in 2006. Mantas solutions available under the Reveleus GRC framework include Oracle Mantas Know Your Customer, Oracle Mantas Trading Compliance, Oracle Mantas Broker Compliance and Oracle Mantas Anti Money Laundering. The Reveleus Enterprise Risk Management suite included Oracle Reveleus Operational Risk, Oracle Reveleus Basel II, Oracle Reveleus ICAAP and Oracle Reveleus Economic Capital Advanced. The suite has moved on as new risk requirements have emerged and, typical of Oracle, there has been some rebranding, now using the Oracle Financial Services (OFS) tag, so now comprises OFS Analytical Applications Basel III, OFS Basel Regulatory Capital, OFS Market Risk, OFS Operational Risk Analytics, OFS Operational Risk Economic Capital, OFS Analytical Applications Infrastructure, and OFS Asset Liability Management. The disparate source for much of the software means some banks have been confused by the different messages, components


and brands. The underpinning Infrastructure piece is described as a set of tools for data management and security administration for creating a single, consistent, enterprise-wide source of all relevant customer and financial data.


Oracle Financials Accounting Hub


Housed within the Oracle E-Business Suite, the Financials Accounting Hub (initially the Financial Services Accounting Hub) was designed to provide centralised accounting rules, alongside transaction information, with the chart of accounts linked back to the transactions. The aim is streamlined, consistent accounting policies underpinned by the ability to drill down into the underlying data. Financial and global management reporting come off


the one consolidated


repository, so that conflicting requirements can be met. In effect, it is a repository that will be fed by a bank’s


core systems. The first point of contact is a rules-based layer which facilitates the consolidation of data. The information is intended to be reconcilable back to the transactions, with this an important attribute for regulatory requirements, whether IFRS, Basel II, Basel III or AML. It is claimed Oracle’s Hub will work off any GL environment.


It will also interface to any relevant transaction systems and, following Oracle’s investment in I-flex Solutions, there was work to integrate it with Flexcube and Reveleus. In addition,


Oracle signed a strategic agreement with Fernbach in 2006, whereby the Belgian supplier would provide the calculation engines for IFRS. The two companies then gained a major win at Royal Bank of Scotland. Other wins include AT&T and South Africa-based Rand


Merchant Bank (see below). Oracle’s Stephen Skrobala, senior director, EMEA financial services, felt there were four main drivers for banks looking at the Hub. First, some banks were seeking efficiency gains, with more timely and accurate closing. Second was regulatory compliance, perhaps to replace the tactical ‘black box’ type solutions that were put in place alongside spreadsheets to allow them to meet IFRS requirements. Such solutions did not allow the transparency that was now sought by regulators. It was no longer enough for the banks to say, ‘trust us’, said Skrobala, with regulators looking much more closely at the details, including how deals are booked in the ledger. A third driver was to centralise accounting, so ‘taking the ledger out of the core systems’, replacing multiple embedded ones with a single bank or insurance-wide one. And the fourth push was coming from banks wanting to integrate their risk and finance activities. ‘The concept has been around for a while but there is now


Risk Management Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 105


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192