User experiences
SAS claims more than 200 financial services clients for its risk systems.
A lot of the users are long-standing. For instance, Zürcher
Kantonalbank (ZKB), the third largest bank in Switzerland, began its relationship with SAS in June 1995 with credit risk, market risk, and reporting and analysis tools. The establishment of the SAS risk reporting application was the final step of a 30-month risk management project. SAS is now integrated in ZKB’s central control system, with an access control system governing its central data store. There was expansion into Asia, as reflected in a relatively early deal, in November 2002, at Kookmin Bank in South Korea. It became the first in the country to comply with Basel II and integrate credit risk management procedures, claimed Donald MacKenzie, the bank’s CRO. It used the SAS Credit Risk Management tool to achieve this. Other banks in the country, including Woori Bank, followed. IIB Bank in Ireland (which became KBC Bank Ireland, a wholly owned subsidiary of Belgium-based KBC) was looking to implement a solution around Basel II in its home loans division. It signed with SAS in August 2003. By using SAS Risk Management for Banking, Tony Barnes, head of IIB’s programme office, said the bank has been able to release capital assets to the degree that the outlay has had ‘a very short payback period’.
One of the early Asian adopters of SAS technology was Malaysian institution, EON Bank Group. SAS claims it has been a customer since 1983. Fast forward to July 2008, and the bank was looking to consolidate multiple data sources around its credit risk operations as part of its five-year SAS-based Project Quantum Leap. This involved the implementation of integrated banking intelligence solutions from SAS with the aim of improving the structure, control and consistency of its data landscape and organisation across various business units. As part of this project it took SAS Credit Risk Management for Banking to help create new risk models and improve its customer segmentation. The bank claimed it had managed to decrease its credit losses as a direct result of the deployment of this system.
In December 2008, not even the offer of a free version of
Temenos’ T-Risk could dissuade Pakistan’s Allied Bank from taking SAS’s risk management tools to replace the Swiss vendor’s offering. After an 18-month search, Allied Bank, one Pakistan’s largest banks, with over 700 branches, started
implementing SAS enterprise risk management system, customer intelligence software and business intelligence server. SAS beat off competition from Sungard, SAP and Oracle Reveleus.
In May 2009, HSBC announced that SAS Fraud Management (a solution it had first developed, launched and rolled out with SAS, via HSBC in the US, in October 2007) had also gone live across Europe and Asia Pacific, with Hong Kong, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Macau, Brunei and Sri Lanka using it for all their credit card transactions. HSBC UK, including First Direct and M&S Money, also had the solution to cover all UK credit and debit cards. An upgraded version went live across HSBC’s Asia ops in June 2011. This included an API to deliver alerts for key products and channels, including ACH, wire, phone and internet banking, and broker surveillance. July 2009 saw SAS move into Africa with Firstbank of
Nigeria, which selected the vendor’s full risk management suite. The bank was mainly looking for compliance (particularly with Basel II), but also wanted help managing risk, transparency and control within its data. SAS was assisted by its local partner, Resourcery Nigeria, in deploying the analytics-based regulatory risk solution in the bank. A month later, SAS won a deal at Volvofinans, which
provided finance for products marketed by the Volvo car company in Sweden. In 2008, two business units, Volvofinans Account and Volvofinans, merged to become Volvofinans Bank. In addition to SAS Credit Scoring for Banking and SAS Credit Risk Management for Banking, Volvofinans purchased SAS Enterprise BI Server, SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, SAS Marketing Automation, SAS Financial Management and SAS Anti-Money Laundering. Before SAS, the company had different systems from two companies. In 2010, a new customer was Israel’s Bank Leumi. The institution had decided to develop its own commercial and corporate credit risk methodology and created a system around the joint analysis of credit risk and portfolio management data. It had been looking for a solution since January 2009. ‘Finding the requisite technology was not straightforward,’ admitted Boaz Galinson, head of Bank Leumi’s credit risk modelling and measurement group. ‘No system on the market met all the generic requirements for both credit rating and portfolio management, let alone those specific to Bank Leumi.’ However, after a year’s search, it signed in early 2010 for SAS Credit Scoring for Banking, and SAS Credit Risk for Banking products.
As part of the package, Bank Leumi, opted for a Risk Management Systems & Suppliers Report |
www.ibsintelligence.com 127
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192