search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
risk capabilities to broader applications, as Sungard itself has done with an offering such as Front Arena. While some of the banks that are listed as Adaptiv users took Sungard systems in their previous form, such as CITIC Industrial Bank in China which signed for Panorama in 2001 or ING with Credient, Sungard’s claim is that more or less all users are now on the newer Adaptiv versions.


User experiences


In 2007, Daewoo Securities became the first Korean securities company to take Sungard’s Adaptiv 360, although there were already a number of Korean banks as users. The securities players in the country were evolving and were having to comply with stricter regulations, said Sungard’s Asia Pacific president, John Wilson. The solution would help Daewoo Securities to provide risk management for its equity derivatives business. In the same year, Canada-based ATB Financial took the solution on an enterprise-wide level. This was to provide the 153-branch bank, an existing Sungard user, with a framework to capture, process and manage its derivatives portfolios. Juerg Hunziker, president of Sungard’s Adaptiv business, said ATB was looking to consolidate its technology environment and streamline its business processes as well as implement a risk reporting solution to monitor its market and credit exposure. ATB Financial served over 600,000 customers at this time.


Meanwhile, South Africa-based Adaptiv client, Standard


Bank Group, added the Adaptiv Analytics solution to cover simulation-based methodologies for its derivatives portfolios. The product was taken to integrate with the Adaptiv Credit Risk solution which was already used by Standard Bank for enterprise-wide counterparty credit risk management. Standard Bank had taken Adaptiv Credit Risk on an ASP basis in early 2005. The system was hosted at Sungard’s Johannesburg data centre.


That original contract was the product of a year-long in-


house search, divided between the two ‘largely independent’ wholesale corporate and investment banking divisions in


User list Adaptiv


Example customers


American Express Bank (UK) ATB Financial (Canada) Bank of Montreal (Canada) CITIC Industrial Bank (China) Daewoo Securities (South Korea) Deutsche Postbank (Germany) Faisal Islamic Bank (Egypt) HDFC Bank (India)


ING (Netherlands) Kookmin Bank (South Korea) National Australia Bank (Australia) National Bank (US)


National Bank of Canada (Canada) National Bank of Greece (Greece) Nordea (Nordic region) Saxo Bank (Denmark) Standard Bank (South Africa) WestLB (Germany)


Risk Management Systems & Suppliers Report | www.ibsintelligence.com 139


Of course, all of Sungard’s treasury and capital markets have risk management support (Quantum gained Emir support in a release in early 2014, for instance) and there is a host of other applications, sometimes country-specific, that address different areas of risk and compliance, across both sell- side and buy-side (Hedge360 for hedge funds, for instance).


Johannesburg and London. There was ‘significant interaction with shortlisted vendors’, said John Stathoulis, the bank’s director for risk management in Johannesburg. He was not willing to reveal the unsuccessful suppliers. Standard Bank adopted the system as part of its plans to


standardise and consolidate platforms across the two centres. As a major external driver for change, incumbent supplier, LogicaCMG, had given Standard Bank notice it was no longer prepared to support its product. In addition, said Stathoulis: ‘We needed to get onto a platform that was capable of growing with us in the new regulatory environment.’ The roll-out was in three phases, starting with vanilla


trading products being moved onto the ASP service from source systems in London and Johannesburg. The next stage was focused on the banking book products. Finally, all exotics were meant to be shifted to the new platform. There are some customers with a mix of Adaptiv and Ambit


Risk. National Bank of Greece, which already used Adaptiv for market risk, took Bancware (so one component of what became Ambit Risk) in 2007 for regulatory reporting and Basel ll Pillar 2 and 3 support. The bank also deployed the Bancware Data Integration application, to aggregate data across its technology platforms and to help streamline its


capital


management process. A broad taker of Sungard’s risk solutions in mid-2014


was Faisal Islamic Bank in Egypt, which set about building an operational framework for managing risk exposure, reporting and Basel compliance. The solutions were taken to replace largely manual processes and in part was looking for ‘best practice’ by taking out-of-the-box risk reporting and monitoring.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192