This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Table 21.7 Example Definitions of the Magnitude Levels for a Generic Receptor Receptor


Criteria High Hydrogeology


Major change from the baseline conditions. Major permanent or long-term change to groundwater quality or available resource. The quality and / or quantity of the existing resource is impacted beyond repair. Changes to quality or water levels would have a significant impact upon ecological designated sites.


Medium


Changes to the local groundwater regime are predicted to have a slight impact on resource use but not derogate any existing abstractions. Minor impacts on local and regionally important ecological sites may result.


Low


Changes to groundwater quality, levels or yields would only have minor, short-term impact on existing resource use or ecology.


Negligible


Negligible change to groundwater baseline conditions approximating to a ‘no change’ situation.


21.4.3.3 Impact significance 37.


Hydrology (Surface Water Quality)


Impacts result in ‘widespread’ water quality deterioration resulting in a deterioration in the WFD status of the water body.


Significant change in water flow leading to damage to fisheries or sensitive habitats.


Impact to water quality limited in spatial extent so that it does not constitute deterioration in the water body status.


Change in water flow but limited in temporal extent so that there is no damage to fisheries or sensitive habitats.


Impact to water quality limited in spatial and temporal extent so that it does not constitute deterioration in the WFD water body status.


No measurable change in flow.


No discernable change in water quality.


No measurable change in flow.


Following the identification of receptor sensitivity and magnitude of the effect, it is possible to determine the significance of the impact. A matrix as presented in Table 21.8 will be used wherever relevant.


38.


The impact significance is then determined by considering magnitude in relation to the sensitivity of the receptor impacted, as demonstrated by the matrix presented in Table 21.8.


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm


Chapter 21 Water Resource and Flood Risk Page 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58