This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PEER-REVIEW | DERMATOLOGY | presented by Fanous et al., highlights the importance


Table 1 The six genetico-racial categories


CATEGORY DESCRIPTION The Nordics


Individuals originating from Northern Europe


Eg: Scandinavians, Irish or Scottish roots


of incorporating the genetic and racial origin of the patient during assessment1–3


. The authors’ observation on The Europeans


Individuals originating from mid Europe


Eg: German, English, Northern Spanish, Northern Italian, Polish or French roots


The Mediterraneans Individuals originating from southern Europe, most northern Africa and western middle Asia


Eg: Southern Italians, southern Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, Lebanese, Iranians


The Indo-Pakistanis


Individuals originating from upper middle Africa, western lower Asia


Eg: Indian, Pakistani, Thai, Egyptians or Saudi roots


The Africans


Individuals originating from middle and lower Africa


Eg: Sudanese, Ethiopians, South Africans


the ‘north to south’ phenomenon that depicts the change in skin colour and features across the globe formed the base for this classification. The important variables that were taken into account were the colour of the skin, thickness of the skin, and facial characteristics. Accordingly, six genetico-racial subtypes were described from the three founding races (Table 1). The authors highlighted the importance of the role of genetics in determining a patient’s response to medical and cosmetic treatment1–3


. The most popular classification system is the


Fitzpatrick classification, which is based on genetic background and skin reaction to UV light exposure (Table 2). The classification is considered as the gold standard and a simple guide to predict outcome of therapies and risk of skin cancers4


. Later, many similar classifications


were developed based on the complexion and characteristics of the skin. The Robert’s skin type classification system evaluates four important elements: phototype, hyperpigmentation, photoageing and scarring. This system helps to predict the skin’s response to injury and insult from cosmetic procedures and helps to predict impending complications5


. The Obagi skin


classification considers five important variables to classify the skin. These include the skin colour, oiliness, thickness, laxity, and fragility6


. The Kawada skin The most popular


classification system is the Fitzpatrick


classification, which is based on genetic


The Asians


Individuals originating from central and eastern Asia


Eg: Koreans, Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos


background and skin reaction to UV light exposure.


classification system analyses Japanese skin types based on personal history of sun reactivity. The Glogau scale considers the degree of photoageing, wrinkling, and discolouration of the patient’s skin7,8


. The system is not


applicable for mixed race individuals. Other classifications include the Lancer ethnicity scale, the Goldman world classification of skin types, the Willis and Earles scale, the Taylor hyperpigmentation scale, and the Baumann skin type solution9–12


. The


Willis and Earles classification is especially designed for people of


African origin. Most of the systems consider the genetic and racial origin as an important factor in the classification. In the clinical practice, the skin types are correlated to post- procedure outcomes after diverse dermatological and surgical procedures.


Facial differences in skin The properties of the skin and its response to external stimuli are largely


determined by its genetic origin,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68