WESTMINSTER WATCH GARETH MORGAN
BRIDGING THE PRICE GAP Policy makers and campaigners are considering the impact of APD devolution T
he May elections are significant because of the breadth of their scope. On one day
(May 5) we will see people go to the polls for the Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and London Assemblies; and for local elections in English cities such as Bristol, Sheffield, Birmingham and Leeds, among many others. These elections are
important in their own right. But, particularly with the elections in the devolved nations and the ‘devo max’ negotiations that have been underway, there are some interesting changes to the constitutional arrangements in the UK that are relevant for business travel – especially the fragmentation of the tax system. That sounds a bit dry, but
we are potentially approaching a point where a business traveller in Newcastle might be faced with the option of using their local airport with a fare
that includes Air Passenger Duty (APD), or travelling an hour or so by train up to Edinburgh to utilise a fare without APD. Similarly, a business traveller in Bristol may choose to use their local airport, or drive to Cardiff airport and take advantage of reduced APD for flights originating there.
That is quite a change and is causing policy makers and campaigners to consider the impact that might ripple from a decision around devolution of this relatively simple tax. These people have had some time to consider this already. Northern Ireland secured control of APD for direct long-haul flights back in 2012 and proceeded to eradicate it to prevent airports in the Irish Republic having an advantage. The SNP has for years had a policy of gaining APD control then halving it and waiting to see its impact before considering removing it altogether. More latterly
A business traveller in Bristol may choose to drive to Cardiff airport and take advantage of reduced APD
Second Severn Crossing from England to Wales: a route to a cheaper deal?
there are suggestions that following May’s elections, the Welsh Assembly will also be given control over APD in its jurisdiction, too. Understandably, this is causing disquiet over the respective borders. Newcastle airport and its political representatives have long been calling for consideration on how the removal of APD near to its catchment area will impact on them. Most recently, the West Country’s Conservative representatives are waking up to the impact that Wales slashing APD rates would have on their airports’ passenger numbers and connectivity. What is the solution? The easiest, on a technical basis, would be for the UK to just scrap it entirely, and there is no shortage of folk calling for that. But can we see the Treasury giving up the billions this tax brings in just as a global downturn ups the pressure on whether we can hit a deficit elimination target only just set out in the Autumn Statement? It would be a hell
BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM
of a change of direction if it did come about.
The most radical suggestion coming from some is that we should devolve APD to the new tranche of city-region mayors. In this scenario a mayor for the North East might match the Scottish APD cut, as may the Bristol mayor. But the hotchpotch of APD rates across the country is just too messy for some. It isn’t a painless give-away for the devolved nations though. European Union rules dictate that national tax rates must not vary in a way that is more favourable to individual regions. This ‘fiscal neutrality’ means central government funding for the relevant local authorities would need to be reduced alongside the devolution of powers over APD – with the size of reduction equivalent to the amount of APD that central government would have collected in that area, had APD not been devolved. That would mean, for example, the Welsh Assembly would need to be 100 per cent convinced an APD cut would stimulate trade that would more than make up for the pain of a grant cut. It may be that English regional airports’ ultimate saviour is that cutting APD across the border is just too painful.
Gareth Morgan is a political lobbyist and director with Cavendish Communications (
www.cavendishpc.co.uk). He is an advisor to the Guild of Travel Management Companies (GTMC).
BBT MARCH/APRIL 2016
41
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124