This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MicroscopyPioneers Pioneers in Optics: Robert Grosseteste


From the website Molecular Expressions created by the late Michael Davidson and now maintained by Eric Clark , National Magnetic Field Laboratory , Florida State University , Tallahassee , FL 32306


eclark@magnet.fsu.edu


Robert Grosseteste (1175–1253) .


T e Middle Ages have been largely considered a period of stagnation in thought because fi ſt eenth-century Italian humanists attempted to separate themselves from their predecessors and began to trumpet ideals they believed they held in common with the ancient Greeks and Romans. T e approximately one- thousand-year period that passed after the sack of Rome by the Visigoths, however, was not as dark as it is oſt en portrayed. A number of advances were made in the Middle Ages in a wide variety of fields, including optics. Robert Grosseteste and his famous pupil, Roger Bacon, for instance, were both intrigued by light and its associated phenomena and made notable steps in the discipline.


Robert Grosseteste was born around 1175 in Suffolk, England, and attended the University of Oxford. Subsequently he accepted a position under William de Vere, the Bishop of Hereford, and in 1215, Grosseteste became chancellor of Oxford. In 1221, Grosseteste leſt his post at the university and was provided with various sinecures, advancing steadily through the ecclesiastical ranks. In 1235, he was appointed Bishop of Lincoln, but for approximately fi ve years prior to that time he served as a theology lecturer to the Franciscans, on whom he had a tremendous impact. Grosseteste’s religious views included a belief in the necessity of a highly hierar- chical, centralized church, which he considered to be superior to the state, and an emphasis on the


cure of souls. However, Grosseteste’s dedication to his religion did not blind him to concerns raised by science, and he consis- tently attempted to fi nd rational answers to questions related to both the natural and spiritual worlds. Grosseteste’s earliest infl uence on the scientifi c thought of his day was through the translation of a number of Greek and Arabic scientifi c works into Latin. On some of these translations, including several important writings by Aristotle, he composed insightful commentaries. Grosseteste was particularly interested in astronomy and mathematics, and he asserted that the latter was essential to investigations of natural phenomena. Consequently, his study of light oſt en took a mathematical turn, resulting in a refi nement of


48 doi: 10.1017/S1551929516001085 www.microscopy-today.com • 2017 January


optical science. In his investigations of rainbows, comets, and other optical phenomena, he notably made use of both observational data and mathematical formulations. Moreover, Grosseteste was an early proponent of the need for experimental support of scientifi c theories (a view he clearly passed on to Bacon during his tutelage), and carried out numerous experiments with mirrors and lenses. Findings from many of Grosseteste’s experiments with light appear in a number of treatises. In De Natura Locorum , for example, he provides a diagram related to experimental work with refraction, which illustrates light being refracted when passing through a glass container fi lled with water. T e most famous of Grosseteste’s scientifi c writings, however, was De Luce (On Light) , which was composed between 1215 and 1220. Largely based on biblical, rather than experimental, evidence, Grosseteste argues in De Luce that light is the most basic form of all matter. According to the scholar’s metaphysical outlook, “light is not a form subsequent to corporeity, but it is corporeity itself.”


Volume 24 Number 5


2016 September


www.microscopy-today.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68