From Reearch to Practice Wendy Sims, Reearch Chair
Teacher Pacing in the Ensemble Setting by guest author, Bradley J. Regier, University of Missouri - Columbia
Good teachers continually seek ways to become more pedagogically effective in the classroom. How do we keep our students engaged when there are so many issues to address in so many sections of the ensemble? Multiple aspects contribute to perceived teacher effectiveness, among them planning, motivation, content knowledge, and the feedback we give our students (Tschannen-Moran, Hoy, & Hoy, 1998).
Researchers have examined the success of teacher feedback by focusing on teacher intensity, which has been defined as sustained control of the student/ teacher interaction with efficient, accurate presentation of subject matter combined with enthusiastic affect and effective pacing (Standley & Madsen, 1987). Further investigation by scholars has revealed close correlations between teacher intensity, teacher effectiveness, and teacher pacing (Silveira, 2014). Music education researchers have given particular interest to the relationship between pacing and effective teaching.
As many teachers know, pacing can substantially influence the success of a lesson. If a teacher moves through information too quickly, some students will not fully understand the concepts,
spring 2017 |
www.mmea.net
possibly resulting in more review time than the teacher anticipated. Alternately, if a teacher moves too slowly through the material, students could potentially lose interest and become off-task. Great teacher pacing is almost always present in our best classrooms, and researchers have investigated the commonalities among successful teachers and the effects of their pacing.
In a musical context, pacing has been defined as changes in focus of activity between teacher and students (Yarbrough, 1975; Yarbrough, Dunn, & Baird, 1996). Instruction and pacing in music performance settings have been identified as different from other academic areas because students often have more frequent performance opportunities to demonstrate identified skills. Scholars have recognized that the frequency of teacher and student activity, rather than the duration of such behaviors, corresponds with positive evaluations of preservice teachers (Duke, Prickett, & Jellison, 1998). Research participants also rated the pace more positively when the average lengths of teacher and student activity were shorter rather than longer. Among piano teachers in a one-on-one instructional setting, individuals that were identified as the most skilled by
both expert observer evaluations (Siebenaler, 1997) and student accomplishment (Buckner, 1997) consistently exhibited more rapid alterations between student activity and teacher activity than were demonstrated by less- skilled teachers (Buckner, 1997; Siebenaler, 1997).
Teacher pace can vary according to the error being corrected (Cavitt, 2003). The longest sequence of teacher talk time often happens when ensemble tempo is being corrected and multiple directions are being given, resulting in the pace of rehearsal slowing down. Results of a study of choral rehearsals indicated that those with a slower pace had less- desirable effects, such as lower performance-rating, off-task student behavior, similar teacher facial expressions, incomplete sequences of instruction, less steady teacher speech speed, and similar voice pitch and volume characteristics (Yarbrough, Dunn, & Baird, 1996). The authors of this study suggested that slower teacher pacing could affect both the behavior of students and teacher disposition in front of the classroom.
There are ways in which teachers can improve their pacing. One
See REGIER, p. 48 47
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80
