search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OUTLOOK2017 more news at www.heavyliftpfi.com


If consolidation was the word on the lips of everyone involved in heavy lift and project cargo logistics last year, what is the outlook for 2017? HLPFI editor Ian Matheson spoke with key participants to find out what the new year has in store.


hipping consultancy Drewry kicked off 2017 with a suggestion that


A year for accountability S


improved supply-demand balance and reduced competition from the dry bulk and container sectors could boost multipurpose charter rates, and lead to the first signs of recovery by the end of 2017. Susan Oatway, Drewry’s


lead analyst for multipurpose shipping, said: “I am cautiously optimistic, and a lot more positive than I was at the start of 2016. As always, a lot will depend on what happens in the container and dry bulk sectors.” Those sentiments are shared


with a hint of caution by some ship owners and operators. Kyriacos Panayides,


managing director of shipping line AAL, appears reasonably optimistic: “As the OPEC cuts begin to take effect and new shorter-cycle oil and gas projects – driven by global demand to fill the supply gap – become viable, we are likely to see a sizeable reallocation of capital to productive ends.


I am cautiously optimistic, and a lot more positive than I was at the start of 2016. – Susan Oatway, Drewry


“The mining industry is


already accumulating sentiment towards new future capital expenditure, and infrastructure spending will rise in certain areas like Asia and the Middle East. “However, while structural


challenges are altering the big picture for many shipping segments, the industry remains vulnerable to forces that might


Consolidation and bankruptcies set to continue


SAL Heavy Lift’s Justin Archard believes that while merger and acquisition activity has been very high in the past 24 months across all industries, most growth in the project logistics sector will likely come from acquisitions rather than greenfield investments. “More bankruptcies are likely, with most banks


trying to reduce their loan books. It will put some shipowners under extreme pressure and some will find it a real challenge to meet their financial obligations.” Rickmers-Linie’s Gerhard Janssen said that while


the carrier sector is still fragmented, there has been significant activity already, but “the next wave of


22 January/February 2017


We are likely to see a sizeable reallocation of capital to productive ends. – Kyriacos Panayides, AAL


reduce trade growth.” Gerhard Janssen, director of


marketing and sales at Rickmers-Linie, said that power generation projects continue globally while infrastructure projects will present opportunities for ocean transportation service providers. “We expect that oil and


gas-related projects that have been approved will be executed


consolidation will eventually come. The container sector has set the pace, and others will follow. “On the shipper side,


whether mergers and takeovers like GE and Alstom, or Bayer and


Monsanto, will have any impact on future investments, remains to be seen.” BBC Chartering’s Raymond Fisch says the project


shipping market still has too many players on the supply side and “consolidation is essential to create a better environment”. His views are shared by Hansa Heavy Lift’s Max Harmstorf who sees “a trend towards developing partnerships and further mergers and acquisitions in 2017”.


and not delayed or postponed.” Janssen said this all depends


on the evolution of oil and gas prices. “If they head upwards, we might see more exploration and project expansion.” Justin Archard, corporate


director – commercial at SAL Heavy Lift, also believes that prospects for the global oil and gas market, and the project logistics companies that serve that sector, “will depend on if the oil price hangs onto its gains and continues to rise”. Even so, Archard said that


the effects of this will not be felt in 2017. “We expect some mothballed projects to be revived ... industry has pared back costs as far as they can. “We think that general


industrial machinery will continue to underpin freight volumes in slightly larger numbers this year.” Raymond Fisch, senior vice


president strategic projects at BBC Chartering, said he sees an ongoing strong business cycle and good prospects for wind energy and petrochemical projects. “The reinstated supply


control by OPEC may help the oil and gas sector to recover.” Max Harmstorf, director


Like Archard, Fisch believes that managing


liquidity is a top priority and “we would not be surprised to see more shipping businesses exit if sufficient solvency cannot be secured”. AAL’s Kyriacos Panayides sees that large-scale


consolidation is already a reality in the wider shipping industry. “With billions of dollars of outstanding loans to shipowners, further restructuring is inevitable. Our doors are open for discussions about partnerships that can deliver sustainable, strategic value.” Both Panayides and Harmstorf said that while


bankruptcies are regrettable, they do give the industry the chance to learn from past mistakes. Not one to mince his words, Philip Adkins (pictured),


chief executive officer of ZPMC-Red Box Energy Services said: “2017 will be a year of accountability. The recovery is still two years away. Blood and red ink will flow through the market, washing away the weak.”


www.heavyliftpfi.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148