This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Training & Development


The case for flexibility at work


Trainer and Motivational Speaker Frank Newberry looks at recent research into the impact of ‘zero hours contracts’ and compares the reported pros and cons of this growing employment practice


A QUICK update first. You may recall in my last article - ‘Getting a more objective view of difficult situations at work’ - I considered the ‘drama triangle’ and how it can be so tempting to slip into the victim mentality at work during difficult times. I also listed some of the organisations that exist to help us when we have worries in the workplace.


On a related matter, you may have seen in the news that the number of people in serious debt in the UK has risen to 8.8 million. Nearly one-in- five of us are in serious debt.


Apparently, 48% of people in serious debt are homeowners, 58% of them are in work and 74% of those in serious debt have acknowledged that they are “unhappy”. That said, only 17% of them have sought advice on dealing with their debts. I suspect that some groundsmen and greenkeepers may be in this 8.8 million figure.


Doing some quick mental arithmetic leads me to ask a question. Does this mean that 57% of the ‘unhappy’ people in serious debt are ‘happy’ to be victims and do not want to help themselves?


If we add in those that are not unhappy then are the 83% of people in serious debt happy to do nothing about their situation other than incur more debt? Are they willing victims in a drama triangle?


If you are, or you know someone who is, in serious debt then the National Debt Line on 0808 808 4000, the Money Advice Service on 0300 500 5000 and the Citizens Advice Bureau (visit them at your local office or online) all exist to help people manage their debts.


Zero Hours Contracts


Indebtedness, of course, can limit our flexibility. We may have to count the pennies before we go to the supermarket or replace an item that has worn out or been broken. The flexibility I want to touch on today though is the flexibility that employers believe that zero hours contracts can bring to the workplace.


This article reports recent research findings, but it is not intended to be authoritative, and I am certainly not giving advice. I suggest that, if you want independent advice on zero hours contracts, you try (say) the legal helpline of your staff association.


I do want to make the point that zero hours contracts have been on the rise since 2008 and you may have to prepare yourself to sign one when you change jobs or when you


140 PC DECEMBER/JANUARY 2014


have your terms and conditions ‘updated’ by your employer.


We may have to accept that it could happen to you one day, so let’s be ready for them with the right ideas and the right attitude should they appear one day.


Definition of a zero hours contract


A zero-hours contract is an agreement between two parties in which an employee may be asked to perform work for an employer with no minimum set contracted hours. The contract will provide what pay the individual will get if he or she does work and will deal with circumstances in which work may be offered and possibly turned down.


Key Results of the Research


The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) published the results of its research in the summer of 2013. Their report - Zero Hours Contracts: Myth and Reality - suggested that there are now just over 1 million people (or 3.1% of the workforce) employed under a zero-hours contract. There is no indication in their methodology that significant numbers of, or indeed any, turfcare professionals were surveyed, but here are some of the key results of their research:


The CIPD reports that, in all, just under a quarter of employers report that they employ people on zero- hours contracts. 70% do not currently use individuals on zero- hours contracts and 7% did not know if they did - when surveyed.


On average, organisations that use zero-hours contracts estimate that one in five of their workforce are engaged under these terms.


The CIPD reports that the most common reason for using zero-hours contracts is that these arrangements provide employers with the flexibility to manage fluctuations in demand. About half of employers also believe that zero-hours contracts are a means of providing flexibility for staff.


No minimum contracted hours


The CIPD reports that almost half of zero-hours contract workers report they are satisfied with having no minimum contracted hours, with 27% saying they are dissatisfied and almost a quarter neither satisfied nor dissatisfied.


Staff availability for work


61% of employers report that zero- hours staff are not contractually obliged to accept work and are free to turn it down. However, 15% say zero-hours staff are contractually


required to be available for work, and 17% report that, in some circumstances, zero-hours contract staff are expected to be available for work.


Obligation to accept work


In all, 80% of zero hours workers say they are never penalised for not being available for work, 17% say they are sometimes penalised and 3% say they are always penalised if they are not available.


More hours please?


Surprisingly, 52% of zero-hours workers do not want to work more hours than they get at the moment. 38% say they would like to work more hours and 10% are undecided.


Notice given that work is or is not available


In all, 46% of zero-hours contract workers say that they either receive no notice at all (40%) or they find out at the start of a shift that work is no longer available (6%).


Working for other employers at the same time


60% of zero-hours workers report they are allowed to work for another employer when their main employer has no work available. 15% say they are able to sometimes. Just 9% say they are never able to work for another employer and a sizeable 17% don’t know.


Pay rates


64% of employers who use zero- hours workers report that hourly rates for these staff are about the same as an employee doing the same job on a permanent contract. 18% report that hourly rates for zero- hours staff are higher than permanent employees. 11% report that they are lower.


Employment status


64% of employers classify zero-hours staff as employees, 19% describes them as workers. Only 3% of employers classify their zero-hours contract workers as self-employed. 7% of employers have not classified their status and a similar proportion (7%) don’t know. The remaining 6% say that they employ zero-hours contracts on a variety of these arrangements.


Job satisfaction and job quality - very similar and sometimes better


60% of zero-hours contract workers agree or strongly agree they are satisfied with their job with 19% disagreeing. This figure is very similar to that of all employees, i.e. 59% agree and 20% disagree.


On average, 65% of zero-hours


workers say they are satisfied with their work-life balance compared with 58% of all employees.


In all, 29% of zero-hours contract workers say they feel under excessive pressure either every day (8%) or once or twice a week (21%). This compares with 41% of all employees who feel under excessive pressure either every day (13%) or once or twice a week (28%).


In all, just over half of zero-hours contract workers would recommend their organisation as an employer compared with 56% of all employees.


Less than one in three zero-hours workers are looking for a new job compared with 24% of all employees.


However, zero-hours workers are less likely to agree they are treated unfairly by their employer than the average employee. In all, 27% of zero-hours workers agree that they don't think their employer treats them fairly compared with 29% of all employees.


Conclusions of the CIPD Research


Pros - The CIPD research suggests that zero-hours contracts, managed properly, can work for both employers and individuals. Zero- hours workers are much more likely to be satisfied with having no minimum set contracted hours than they are to be dissatisfied. They also report marginally higher levels of overall job satisfaction than the average employee.


Cons - Some employers are not providing written terms and conditions for zero-hours contract staff, and a significant proportion of zero-hours workers report having pre-arranged work cancelled with no notice or at the start of a shift. There is also significant confusion among employers and zero-hours workers over employment status and rights.


CIPD Recommendations


Following their research, the CIPD made some recommendations for employers. These can be found in their report ‘Zero Hours Contracts: Myth and Reality’ which is available as a download from their website www.cipd.co.uk.


If you are feeling troubled by what is going on at work, a good place to start might be to contact Chris Johnson, Pitchcare’s Training Co- ordinator at chris@pitchcare.com. She can tell you immediately which training programme will help you to have more real influence and impact at work when (for example) you have to deal with the prospect of new working arrangements.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156