Equestrian
worth reassessing Kelso’s optimum use of the turf.” “Also, with regard to the welfare of the horse, we should constantly be asking ourselves whether or not our course design is still the most desirable, or if there is a need to modernise.” The new layout has increased flexibility of racing lines and siting hurdles considerably, and has also improved the consistency of the racing surface in the home straight and pull up area. It was introduced for the 2012-13 National Hunt season, and the practical advantages were immediately obvious. “By removing the need for by-passing space close to the winning post on the chase course, there is now additional fresh ground for the hurdle course on that important section of the track. Modern race programmes put so much extra pressure on hurdle courses which also stage regular National Hunt Flat races. In an average year, hurdle field sizes are much larger than on the chase course,” explains Hazel.
The dividing rail between the two tracks at the winning post now has more flexibility, with the removal of both the elbow and the chase fence in front of the stands which required by-passing space on its outer. Now there is an additional 15
metres of hurdle track width, which correlates to three extra meetings of fresh ground (with each requiring five metres). This also benefits spring fixtures and eases pressure on the irrigation regime. “We did not need to water before the start of the autumn season and, in spring, the need for irrigation should be less since it is often the more damaged ground that dries out first and requires watering to prevent it becoming too rough,” comments Hazel. “And, if we do have to irrigate, there will be less stress on the sward from the shock of cold water, as it is in better condition before we start.” The work has had a significant impact on the course presentation during the winter. “Wear and tear on the ground would historically have been irrelevant with only six or seven days racing a year, some of which were two-day meetings, allowing plenty of time for recovery between fixtures," Hazel comments. “However, we now have fourteen fixtures a year, so recovery needs to be much quicker and the project has really assisted us in this respect. The track repair team after racedays immediately noticed the difference.” There were also changes to the fence layouts: a chase fence was removed from
in front of the stands and the two open ditches were replaced by just one, which is now located as the first obstacle in the home straight, and has been re-orientated to head up the chase course rather than towards the former elbow. “This juggle of fences also means the chase course can now host a two mile five and a half furlong distance, which augurs well for those horses that need a trip between two and three miles, previously uncatered for at Kelso,” Hazel explains. The new layout has added excitement to the racing for the paying public, as the quality of jumping in the final stages of the race has been made more significant by bringing both the final flight of hurdles and chase fence closer to the winning post. There is also a horse welfare element to this, as Hazel explains: “The final flight and fence were previously two furlongs away from the winning post, and horses inevitably had a hard race as, after the last, they slogged it up the long finishing straight.” Parade ring walkways have all been upgraded to be fully non-slip, with a £12,000 investment in Stablesoft’s rubberised material which was laid in time for the 2012 season. “They look a great deal tidier as well as being much safer,” states Hazel.
“There was understandable resistance from traditionalists to changing a much-loved character trait such as the ‘elbow’, but we felt that, in the light of new pressures imposed on the track, it was worth reassessing our use of turf”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156