This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
3D / LARGE FORMAT FILM


FULLDOME VERSUS FLAT SCREEN


With the current trend for fully immersive experiences, many operators are investing in domes. But do these provide a better experience than a fl at screen presentation? Kathleen Whyman asks the experts


MICHAEL DAUT director of show production/marketing, Evans & Sutherland Digital Theater


“T


here’s something amazing about the shape of a dome that draws us into an experience more effortlessly than a fl at


screen. An essential way of qualifying the experience is this: we look at a fl at screen; we look into a dome. It’s nearly impossible to describe the impact of a dome theatre experience, because it’s so immersive. The visuals surround your fi eld of sight


as you’re transported inside a cinematic event. It’s kind of like surround-sound for your eyes. That said, content makes all the difference. Bad content on a dome is no better than bad content on a fl at screen, and frankly, because of a dome’s height- ened immersion, bad content on a dome may feel worse. One of the interesting


facts about 3D is the way it’s achieved. Stereo 3D combines two views of


(Right) Evans & Sutherland’s Experience Aurora show


60


the same scene captured from slightly dif- ferent vantage points, usually separated by the distance between our eyes. This ‘eye separation’ often changes based on what is being captured and how far into the screen or into the audience you want a 3D effect to appear. Because domes wrap imagery around you far more than a fl at screen, the eye separation has to be chosen carefully to avoid eye-strain. This becomes more of a problem for fl at screen 3D fi lms converted to display on the dome, as wide eye separation will become even wider on the dome, and in some cases will be very diffi cult or impossible to watch. We’ve developed a patent-pending


stretching and warping algorithm for map- ping 4:3 giant screen fi lm content onto the surface of a dome with about 70 per cent coverage. This covers more surface area than a typical fi sheye lens on a giant screen fi lm projector with signifi cantly less distortion, especially on the sides and top of the image. This algorithm preserves 3D in these giant screen fi lms, but we need to format fi lms with wide eye separation differently.


Game changer The home theatre indus- try has been more of a game changer than any- one could have predicted. If people can consume


content in their homes, what compelling reason exists for


Read Attractions Management online attractionsmanagement.com/digital


them to go to a theatre? Commercial thea- tres need something unique that’s not as readily available for in-home viewing. With a 3D fl at screen, there’s more of


a fi ghting chance to claim some unique- ness and rise above the din of the other home and portable media that’s so readily available in just about any form imaginable. However, with the advent of 3D televisions, who knows how much this will water down the appeal of going to the theatre to see a 3D movie over the next few years. Domes, however, will take a very long


time to penetrate the home theatre market, so they create a unique experience that’s worth paying to go and see. Domes aren’t a current trend – they’ve


existed for centuries in various forms in cathedrals and other architecture all around the world. There’s something about their shape that fascinates us and seems to connect with us on an essential level. I They’re here to stay as a fi xed projection surface in the digital cinema industry.”


AM 2 2011 ©cybertrek 2011


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78