This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
event review


Kate Cracknell asks delegates from the recent IHRSA European Congress for their thoughts on the event’s highlights


EUROPE EUROPE


FOCUS


food for thought


Miles Rimell Head of marketing, Precor EMEA & APAC


A


n underlying theme, which permeated the extensive range of topics covered at this


year’s congress, was benchmarking – something we don’t currently excel at as an industry. Whether it was the need to create KPIs in order to more actively benchmark ourselves, the success that looking to other industries for expertise can bring, or the need to be selective in who we benchmark ourselves against, it was a notable undercurrent in a series of different presentations. Nick Burrows, then MD at Nuffi eld


Health, talked about the need to further benchmark member activity in order to measure their achievements and subsequently reward them. Accurate member activity data is also a necessity when in dialogue with third parties such as health insurers and governments. Burrows also discussed the need,


when attempting to build a brand identity, to benchmark against companies such as Coke and Nike that – in spite of their size and broad portfolio – have successfully delivered a simple, compelling brand proposition.


72 Christian Majgaard, former head of


global & business development at Lego, revealed that the company’s success was in part down to the realisation that, although they had a successful team, they needed to bring in people with specialist outside skills to really drive the business forward into new areas. And Ray Algar, speaking about the


growth of the low-cost gym sector, referenced extremely lucrative low- cost models that already operate in other sectors, including easyjet and Aldi. Budget gyms may be in their infancy in our industry, but the low- cost proposition has been operating successfully for decades. Algar argued that we can learn valuable lessons by looking to the business models of these trusted and profi table low-cost brands. Benchmarking aside, the theme of


Algar’s session – the rise of the low- cost sector, how it’s transforming the European market and what other operators can learn from the model – was the overriding topic of the Congress, often under discussion during break- outs. Based on his 2010 UK Low-cost Gym


Read Health Club Management online at healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital


We must benchmark member activity to motivate and reward them


Sector Report, Algar illustrated how the shift to low-cost has gained momentum in the recessionary environment of the past year, which has encouraged consumers to test low-cost brands. The move away from conspicuous


consumption is not to be under- estimated and, as customers are likely to remain interested in genuine value once they’ve experienced the quality of low-cost products, Algar argued that it’s a concept that’s here to stay. Budget gyms have helped create a


new consumer proposition that disrupts the rules upon which the fi tness industry was fi rst built. And the compact, tightly- run and effi cient operation of low-cost offerings is a business model that other operators will be challenged by and need to ensure they learn, or differentiate themselves, from.


january 2011 © cybertrek 2011 T


he 10th annual IHRSA European Congress took place in Barcelona, Spain in October, with a record


attendance – over 500 delegates from 26 countries, of which more than 260 were first-time attendees. “There was excellent feedback


following this year’s Congress, as well as the highest ever attendance. It’s clear that European industry leaders value this event and the opportunity it gives them to come together and learn from one another,” says IHRSA’s European director Hans Muench. “Our sponsor showcase brought


20 companies together with club personnel, networking extended to include an outing to the Champions League game on the fi nal evening, and the educational programme provided valuable, thought-provoking insights from a varied range of speakers.” We ask a selection of delegates for their thoughts on the congress.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84