This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
038


INTERVIEW / BERNHARD BSTIELER


Right East Central Gallery, Shoreditch, London, 2009 Architect: Dow Jones Architects


Inverse designed a scheme of meandering wires as a primitive electric circuit board to bring light to the artwork locations. Taking a hands-on approach in order to design, test and source the lighting equipment, Inverse specified and sourced lamp holders, wiring, fixing system and aluminum rods that form the adjustable lamp holders to illuminate each work perfectly


Below Wimbledon residence, London, 2007 Architect: Munden Robinson Architects


The exterior of this residence reflects the simplicity of modern architecture with pure forms and clean lines. While the straight lines provide the main visual structure, the elegant curved wall of the staircase helps softening the overall appearance. Buried uplights to the trees, with sodium and warm white metal halide light sources, create layers of light and 3-dimensional appearance of the landscape


Pic: Mark Robinson


design company Isometrix, then and still one of the leading lighting design compa- nies in the UK. Just two years later Bstieler started his own company while freelancing for award-winning Campbell Design (now merged with DPA). Bstieler’s company took somewhat longer to take off because he was doing so much freelancing. After five years, he decided to team up with another two colleagues, Filip and Onur, and founded Inverse in 2006. Many years earlier they had taken part in a competition for urban lighting which they won, but it wasn’t until the founding of Inverse that they got back together as a professional working team. It was a gradual process. Bstieler was at first the only full time participant but they made transitional targets for the others who later became full time. By 2007 they had already submitted and achieved first prize in the Residential category of the UK Light- ing Design Awards.


These days, Bstieler flits between China, India, Dubai, the UK and Thailand. How are things different in Thailand? “The main difference about working in Thai- land,” he says, “is that most of the time it has to be very low cost so it’s not easy to maintain quality of projects... suppliers offer several brands starting with the most expensive. As soon as the budget gets lower they downgrade and of course the quality suffers. The design process is also different. They use lighting design information for


construction without doing shop drawings, so a lot of important details that should have been integrated into the initial design, get lost. This occurs particularly in Thai- land. Even in India and China this problem isn’t so prevalent. So the designer has to spend a lot of time physically on site. Here, we don’t know until it’s built whether the planned result will be achieved or not.” But, “The profession is still quite young here,” he continues. “Despite several new lighting design companies, with Vision Light- ing Design (headed by La-orchai Boonpiti) still being the longest in the business here, most lighting design is still done by the sup- pliers.”


This particular dilemma is not peculiar to Thailand; what does he think about lighting suppliers providing design services? “That’s a tricky one. I personally don’t see it as a threat because at the end of the day they will end up with a scheme where they (the suppliers) use only their own products. So, I get approached by clients who say ‘We want an independent designer to create something unique and choose the right product for the job’. As a result, very often costs are saved for the client because the lighting designers come up with original ideas and offset their creative fees with cost efficient solutions.”


Bernhard Bstieler has a reputation for not shying away from low budget projects, he sees it as a challenge and an opportunity


Pic: Filip Vermeiren


to come up with creative solutions. Some examples are: a refurbishment of a period house in Notting Hill with Sanei-Hopkins Ar- chitects; the East-Central Gallery in London by Filip Vermeiren, another partner in the London office, which received a commenda- tion for its low-cost solution (UK Lighting Design Award 2010 – Special projects). A very recent article in The Economist stat- ed “ ... for those who truly wish to reduce the amount of energy expended on lighting the answer may not be to ban old-fashioned incandescent bulbs, as is the current trend, but to make them compulsory”. How does Bstieler feel about this controversial issue? “It’s too simplistic to just ban all incan- descents. When I first came to Thailand, the first thing I have noticed was that the colour of the light in domestic homes, shops etc is much cooler than used in Europe or the US, even the MIddle East. So it’s not much of an issue here; replacing incandes- cent with fluorescent, because it’s already happened.


“I feel traditionally there is a lot to discover about the lighting preference in different cultures, but very often it is not so easy to back track. In temples they now use lots of fluorescent light whereas in the past they relied on much more ambient lighting compared to times when there was less use of fluorescents. These days natural light is starting to play a lesser role because it’s so easily taken over by artificial light. I


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168