HOW TO
COMMUNICATE DIFFICULT DECISIONS
As discussed in part one, difficult decisions can be very hard to make, and communicating them can sometimes be harder still. In this the second of two articles Trainer and Conference Speaker, Frank Newberry, considers how we can respond positively to the challenge of communicating difficult decisions.
SADLY, as the recession progresses, organisations in the turfcare sector continue to make difficult and unpopular decisions. Reading this, you too may have recently experienced, or at least know of, pay freezes, reduced hours in which to do the same work, friends or relatives that have been made redundant and so on.
Difficult decisions do not get easier once they have been made. Suspicion and intrigue always seem to surround difficult decisions. Is the employer using the recession to get rid of the people s/he does not like? Are they keeping only the less expensive or least assertive staff?
In the case of redundancies there is also ‘survivor guilt’ to contend with. Those who have kept their jobs (for the time being) feel bad about their workmates losing theirs. Their ex-workmates even turn up at work or social events wearing their ‘victim’ status for all to see. Meanwhile, the guilty survivors buy them a drink and wonder who will be next for the chop.
People still ‘bottle out’ when communicating difficult decisions
Having experienced both being made redundant and having to make other people redundant, it is with concern that I view the extent to which people still ‘bottle out’ when communicating difficult decisions. It is as if supervisors and managers are not aware that those still in work are judging them by their performance in these difficult situations.
If bosses want their work teams to do the same work (or even more) with less people, then they need to be seen to be handling these situations competently and fairly.
122 How bad news is being delivered
You may have heard the news stories about redundancy notices being texted to people, or even the recent survey that revealed the primary methods used by organisations to deliver bad news to be:
29% by e-mail message
19% face-to-face meetings with direct supervisors
18% face-to-face meetings with senior managers
12% letter or memo from senior managers 8% internal employee website 6% teleconference/videoconference 3.5% organisation newsletter 0.5% none 4% other
It is rather sobering to see the number of organisations that let the internet deliver their bad news for them.
Russell Grossman (a senior manager at the BBC) put it best for me when he said: “Difficult news is best received from people you trust … the more leaders cultivate trust when times are good, the more they will reap the benefits when the cream turns sour.”
For the purposes of this article I will assume that you will be asked (like I was) to have face-to-face meetings with people to give them the bad news. Some good advice on what to say was given by a man called Bob Kustka, (formerly with the Gillette Corporation). He said there are a few things to remember when delivering a difficult message.
1. First, whenever people receive negative information, there is a tendency to go into selective listening mode. This means you will need to choose your words carefully so your message will be understood.
2. Be empathetic, but do not say things like “I know how you feel,” “I wish I didn’t have to do this,” or “This isn't my decision” because, if you’re delivering the bad news, you’re accountable and need to support the decision of management.
3. Lastly, plan your meeting. Don’t wing it. Write down what you intend to say to make sure you cover all the key points.
Always be firm, yet professional, and you will be able to get the right message across.
You may find it more practical and cost- effective to have group meetings followed by one-to-one sessions with those involved.
You will need to factor in that, well before the facts emerge, there will be rumours about what is happening and who is to go. Some of it will be surprisingly accurate. A lot of it will be quite wrong, but people will believe it in the absence of an official statement from someone they trust.
People are already on their guard and have been for some time now
The problem I had when I was required to make people redundant was that the gossip had taken hold well before we knew precisely who was going to be made redundant.
The situation I faced is likely to recur now that we have a recession as pervasive as the one we have now. People are
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140