PCBs
The wild west of PCB design
David Marrakchi, technical marketing manager, Altium, explains how to survive the perilous world of PCB design and ensure that you’re the one riding off into the sunset
D
oes your part selection process ever feel like a scene from a wild west movie, where every stakeholder is out to protect their own self interests at the expense of your own? This is the wild west of PCB design, and it’s not a pleasant scene. In this world, mistakes happen on a daily basis, and those left standing after the dust clears are forced to clean up the mess. In the wild west of PCB design, there’s a showdown about to go happen, and only one man will be left standing. At the centre of this conflict is you, the schematic engineer, and you've got choices to make - you need a part that fits your specific parametric requirements, but you’ve got stakeholders that need part numbers and material selections. What are you going to do?
The duel Steve from procurement stands to your left, glaring at you beneath the rim of his weathered, wide brimmed hat. He wants the best price and availability on his components, and he’s going to get them one way or another, even if it involves you spending the entire weekend redesigning your board. To Steve, if there’s not a part number in his ERP/MRP system, then it’s dead to him. And then there’s Dave, your PCB layout
designer. He stands confidently in front of you. His long, black duster coat ripples in the breeze as his right hand rests on his holster. Dave always wants more information from you about your component selections. If a component isn’t fully spec’d out with a complete parametric profile, manufacturing
number, and manufacturing data, then he can’t do his job. Regardless of which way this showdown
turns out, someone is going to lose. However, does it need to be that way? Why can’t there be a different approach to our part selection process where casualties and rework aren’t part of a daily design process?
The current reality of a part selection process Part selections aren’t easy, and there’s a number of concerns to keep in mind depending on your priorities. As a schematic designer, your early design focus is on selecting components that meet specific engineering requirements. Rarely do you think about where your components will be supplied from, and as far as you’re concerned, any 1uH inductor will get the job done. However, here’s the problems that arise with this approach: • The waiting game. The longer you wait to fill in your part information, the more of a potential backlog you create for your procurement team. • Incomplete layouts.Without complete component data, your layout designer is sitting idle, unsure of what
materials to select or what footprint sizes to use in his board layout. • Last minute decisions. The next thing you know you’re at the end of your deadline, forced to make a series of last minute and ill considered part selections that can delay your production cycles and delay getting your product to market on time. So what are you going to do to solve
these problems? When a sizeable portion of the components you use on a design are brand new, how do you make part choices that will satisfy your schematic design, board layout and procurement needs? The solution isn’t to immediately decide on specific part numbers. As schematic designers, we all know this isn’t a practical approach given the evolving nature of our design process. The only way out of this win-lose situation is to work with a flexible, centralised system that provides every stakeholder in your part selection process with the information they need, right when they need it.
An alternative part choice system? In Altium Designer 16 we’re introducing a brand new Alternative Part Choice System that will evolve your part selection process from a win-lose to a win-win for everyone involved. Here’s how it will work: • As a schematic designer you’ll be able to specify primary and alternative part selections directly in your BoM. Those alternative part choices will then be automatically swapped if a primary component is unavailable or incompatible. • Your layout designer will be able to get to work immediately on his board layout, knowing that he’s got a complete list of components with defined parametric data and precise footprint specifications. • Your procurement team will never have to bother you again with back and forth emails and phone calls, asking if they can swap your component for another because you’ll have already provided them with a list of options.
The bottom line is this - with the new
Alternative Part Choice System, engineers can stick to making engineering decisions, and procurement can stick to making their supply chain decisions. Each stakeholder gets what they want out of the part selection process, with no communication showdowns or shooting from the hip decisions.
www.altium.com 34 December 2015/January 2016 Components in Electronics
www.cieonline.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44