theibcdaily SMPTE to debate latest UHDTV developments
By Hans Hoffman, SMPTE fellow and EBU senior manager
The development of standards for ultra high definition television (UHDTV) offers tremendous promise for enrichment of the in- home viewing experience. Adoption of such standards, and the subsequent rollout of UHDTV services, is becoming increasingly attractive with the ongoing evolution of imaging, processing, and transport technologies, as well as the near completion of the HD migration in many areas. Manufacturers of display systems rightly see ‘beyond HD’ standards and services as drivers for consumer adoption of premium next-generation products. At the same time, pay TV operators and even streaming video service providers understand the standards’ potential to support their launch and delivery of premium programming and channels.
How exactly can UHDTV standards move the industry forward and facilitate provision of better- quality content? The standard for true UHDTV that is defined in ITU Recommendation BT.2020 and SMPTE ST 2036-1 incorporates parameters for higher resolutions, with UHD-1 specifying 4K and UHD-2 specifying 8K, and also for higher frame rates (HFR) and bit depths, with a wider colour gamut.
Sunday
14 September Go with UHD-1 or Wait for UHD-2? 16:00 Emerald Room
making the
differences between light and dark areas of an image much
UHDTV standards dictate frame rates of up to 120 frames per second (fps), compared with the current standard of 50 or 60 fps that ultimately could yield much smoother movement and better detail during camera pans. With this increase in frame rate, which is perceptible at up to six times the picture height, the UHD-1 and UHD-2 standards stand to add significant visual value for the consumer.
By defining a much higher bit depth (the number of bits used for each color component of a single pixel) of 10 or even 12 bits rather than the 8 bits specified in the HDTV standard, UHD-1 and UHD-2 pave the way for two key gains: much better colour precision and the ability to express a broader range of colours. At the same time, the higher dynamic range (HDR) indicated by UHDTV standards ultimately has the effect of
30 theibcdaily
more perceptible for the viewer. Together, these enhancements hold out the possibility for more realistic colours and better visibility of elements within the image. There is no question that UHDTV’s combination of higher resolution, HFR, higher dynamic range, and wider colour gamut promises significant improvements to the quality and impact of moving images. Other cited benefits include a stronger sense of ‘realness’, in addition to the larger field of view that brings the cinema experience to the home, and these gains are complemented by enhanced audio specifications and technology. For many broadcasters and other content providers, however, a number a critical questions persist. Among these is whether to embrace UHD-1, which would indicate a commitment to 4K resolution, or to wait and go with UHD-2, which would require the leap to 8K.
A broader palette This is a nontrivial matter, given that the move from HD to 4K
alone requires significantly more data. With the shift to 8K resolution, demanding many times that yet increase in pixel resolution, as opposed to the other factors examined here, offer the least perceivable impact for viewers positioned more than a couple of yards from the screen. That said, the growing volume of content acquired at higher resolution and in higher-quality formats is providing value to broadcasters long before delivery. In practical terms, they offer a broader palette with
UHD video, and the impact of UHDTV on the services they currently provide.
Questions on the technical side include standardisation — or at least minimisation — of different profiles used to set parameters for frame rate, resolution, and bit depth, as well as how best to optimise the end-to-end chain (whether streaming, satellite, or OTA) for a UHD format and maximise efficiency. The technical and practical aspects of delivering UHD content to home viewers requires the attention of
UHDTV.
Speakers will consider the adoption of UHDTV technology from the points of view of content creation, asset
management, and delivery to the consumer. Their presentations will be followed by an
informative discussion in which they will review professional industry and consumer roadmaps for the two phases of UHDTV and the requirements for standards. The large investment in product development for UHDTV and its speed of acceptance in some areas
Many broadcasters have small budgets, and those limited resources are currently focused on finalising the HD shift
which to work, and this is particularly valuable for premium programming such as live events, which often are characterised by unpredictable lighting and speed of movement within the frame. Considering future plans for UHDTV from the business side, UHD content creators and distributors will likely need to address factors such as an initial scarcity of content, the higher costs involved in creating and delivering content, the limited number of consumer displays equipped to receive and display
standards bodies worldwide, and also of platform and network operators, the professional production industry, and consumers. Produced in association with the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE), the ‘Go With UHD-1 or Wait for UHD-2?’ session on Sunday 14 September 2014, at 16:00, IBC2014 brings together major players in the international broadcast industry to discuss UHDTV challenges and opportunities and to outline their strategies for moving toward
promise to make this session both controversial and educational.
The fact of the matter is that true UHD is a long-term goal. Many broadcasters have small budgets, and those limited resources are currently focused on finalising the HD shift and on establishing trimedia operations — taking an integrated approach to radio, broadcast, online, and streaming media. Though the move toward UHDTV will take an extended effort, activity across the industry is looking very promising.
Hans Hoffmann: The fact of the matter is that true UHD is a long-term goal
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124