ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability still an ‘unclear’ issue in rail
A panel discussion on how sustainability can help deliver supply chain excellence at Infrarail made it clear that mixed messages remain and clarity is needed. David Stevenson reports.
In
2005
the World Summit on Social Development identifi ed sustainable
development goals under three broad areas: economic development, social development and environmental protection.
Nine years on at Infrarail 2014, Chris Williams- Lilley, managing director of Rail Champions, chaired a panel discussion on how sustainability is being adopted by the rail industry and its supply chain.
It’s been seen as a key enabler for the success of many railway projects, he said. In part it’s about “creating a step-change in performance and thinking”.
He asked whether clients in the rail industry know exactly what they want and mean in terms of sustainability. Shaun McCarthy OBE, director of Action Sustainability, gave a short answer: “No.”
Expanding on that, he said: “Clients are starting to develop their understanding of the sustainability agenda and what to ask for, and it is important that they do that.
“Network Rail, as an example, have spent years developing their sustainability policy and we now have something which gives us a defi nition of what sustainability is to the business.”
A few projects offer a great defi nition of sustainable leadership, including Crossrail and Thameslink. But moving beyond the ‘fl uffy’ corporate responsibility idea of sustainability is still a “work in progress”, he added.
Crossrail taking a lead
Liane Hartley, director of Mend London, who has been involved with Crossrail’s sustainability initiatives, believes Europe’s largest infrastructure project has “raised the bar” considerably on social sustainability.
The social side has been the “poor relation” of sustainability and overlooked for decades, but it is now taking centre stage.
“It’s very diffi cult to defi ne social sustainability and I think that’s why a lot of people have avoided it, but simply because it’s hard to defi ne doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be doing it,”
64 | rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 14
It’s important to engage everybody in sustainability – the supply chain, client and staff level all have to be behind it. With over 25 years’ construction industry experience, Wiskin said sustainability has been about ‘you have to do this, otherwise you’re not going to be a client or contractor’. There has been a “culture of compliance”, not a ‘want to’ approach.
“I’m starting to see a change for the positive,” he said, “so I would say we’re now in a ‘maybe process’ about delivering sustainable change.”
Sustainability in terms of health
In terms of operational health, Gren Tipper, board member of Constructing Better Health, said “sustainability has not really been picked up” but must be tackled urgently.
Tipper, who has spent most of his career managing complex construction projects for BAA, said the UK does more sub-contracting the Europe, which can make it diffi cult to communicate messages to the entire supply chain.
Crossrail’s ‘practical’ defi nition relates to job creation, sustainable employment and training, plus diversity and ethical sourcing. “But we’ve really tried to put that in practice, which is quite pioneering,” said Hartley.
‘Want to’ attitude
Steve Wiskin, director of Inspiring Safety Solutions, said that from a behavioural perspective sustainability isn’t “a tick-box exercise” it’s thinking about “what happens next, because sustainability is all about tomorrow, it’s all about the future”.
said Hartley.
He told the audience: “In 2001, John Prescott, the then-deputy prime minister, called the industry to arms to sort out fatalities. At that time, we had on average 105 per year and that has improved. But today, 5,000 people per year in construction contract occupational cancers. This industry accounts for less than 10% of the UK working population, but 56% of all occupational male cancers are derived from work.
“The fi gures are alarming. In terms of ‘is it sustainability?’, yes it is. Our workforce is a valuable and expensive resource to train and we should want people to stay and work for as long as possible.”
Sustainability in CP5
McCarthy made the point that the supply chain is a pyramid, with a few mega-fi rms at the top landing most major contracts, and very many SMEs at the bottom. But in most projects, about 80% of revenue goes to the supply chain.
“So if we’re trying to effect this behaviour change we’re all talking about, if we’re trying to make our supply chains more competent in new skills around sustainability, then we need to collaborate,” said McCarthy.
This is where initiatives like the Supply Chain Sustainability School, launched in 2012, come in. The School, a collaboration between 16 major contractors, including BAM, Balfour Beatty, BRE, Carillion, Laing O’Rourke and Morgan Sindall, is a free and practical resource for developing suppliers’ sustainability skills.
Suppliers get a confi dential self-assessment so they can understand their sustainability strengths and weaknesses, plus a personalised action plan pointing them towards free tools, e-learning and sustainability training.
McCarthy added: “It’s gathered an enormous amount of momentum and it seems to be a way of effi ciently providing something very relevant to small companies in a very selective way. Hopefully, this could be a success in CP5, especially as many of the major contractors have bought into it.”
opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148