INNOVATION & SUPPLY CHAIN
Bringing innovation funding together for a brighter future
David Clarke, director of FutureRailway, says the programme is building on the success of the Enabling Innovation Team (EIT) thanks to a new partnership with Network Rail.
In
2012, the EIT (Enabling Innovation Team) was established to plug the ‘innovation
gap’ facing the country’s railway industry – receiving £30m worth of pilot funding from the Department for Transport to stimulate activity in this area.
During the two years that followed, the EIT ran a whole series of competitions and activities – co-funded with industry – and doubling the original £30m investment to £60m.
Now the organisation, which has been deemed a success and has been given further funding for the next five years, has become FutureRailway after partnering with Network Rail.
David Clarke, director of FutureRailway, told RTM: “We are working together with Network Rail and we are trying to bring together under one roof – and under one banner – all of the innovation funds in the rail industry. That will be much more effective than having one fund here and another there.
“Future Railway has absorbed what was the EIT, and it is now a collaboration between ourselves – who are part of RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd) – and Network Rail.”
Jane Simpson, technical services director at Network Rail, told RTM that its collaboration with RSSB on the FutureRailway programme is central to its work to step up the application of technology through innovation to benefit the whole railway system.
She added: “The RSSB and Network Rail together, as FutureRailway, are working closely with funders such as the Department for Transport, Technology Strategy Board and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
38 | rail technology magazine Jun/Jul 14
Council to optimise the use of funding – and FutureRailway is working with stakeholders from
across the rail industry to ensure
innovation is delivered against a single plan under the Rail Technical Strategy (RTS).”
Delivering the Rail Technical Strategy
The main aim of the FutureRailway programme is to accelerate research, development and innovation to help ensure the industry can deliver the RTS.
Clarke added that the new programme is a really positive move. “Between ourselves and Network Rail, we’ve got £125m worth of funding. If we continue working with the supply chain and others to double that, then that is £250m worth of innovation activity for the rail industry, which is a significant amount.”
More funding could come from European sources, Clarke suggested – the RTS is clearly taken seriously there because Europe’s own version, published in February, bears a “spooky resemblance” to the UK RTS.
With 10 officials from both the RSSB and Network Rail overseeing the running of FutureRailway, the programme is designed to help innovators navigate the complex rail industry landscape and identify the most appropriate route to market.
RTM was told that the organisation will be particularly concentrating on trying to take the current crop of competitions it has already run to the next stage and get them into production.
“Some of the things we’ve recently been doing like aesthetic overhead lines, like Radical Train, and some of the design competitions have been
very innovative,” said Clarke. “But we’ve got to get those beyond the competition and into physical prototypes and that’s a big focus at the moment.”
RTM has included articles on all of those competitions in recent editions, and models of the shortlisted designs from the aesthetic OLE competition with RIBA (pictured) were showcased at Rail Live.
IPEMU Project
In particular, the next big challenge is developing the independently-powered electrical multiple unit (IPEMU), which in simple terms is an EMU (electric multiple unit) with a battery under it.
It is hoped that the IPEMU – the concept for which was showcased at Rail Live 2014 (more on page 111) could be used to bridge ‘gaps’ in otherwise electrified railways, in a much more energy and cost-efficient way than using a back-up diesel engine.
This would lower the cost of electrification projects as a whole, because the sections where overhead line equipment is the most complicated and expensive to install without major civils works, such as in tunnels and under bridges, can be left as they are, with the battery doing the work through those sections.
It could also be a primary traction method on branch lines where full electrification remains economically unviable.
After months of lab testing, the IPEMU project team, which consists of Network Rail, Bombardier, Greater Anglia and FutureRailway, has paved the way for work
OLE competition design by Moxon Architects with Mott MacDonald
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148