This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
JURISDICTION REPORT: TURKEY


THE TURKISH TRADEMARK SYSTEM: THE ESSENTIALS


Isik Ozdogan and Ezgi Baklaci Moroglu Arseven


Even though Turkey is a party to international conventions and has harmonised its trademark laws with those of the EU, there are certain aspects and practices distinctive to Turkish trademark law.


Existence of an earlier trademark is an absolute ground for refusal Contrary to many other jurisdictions, trademark similarity is considered to be an absolute ground for provisional refusal in Turkey. Te Turkish Patent Institute (TPI) oversees the trademark application process. Te TPI’s role is to maintain public order and protect the public from confusion between marks. Te TPI also prevents registrations of inherently unprotectable marks.


When the TPI receives a trademark application, it conducts a search of registered trademarks to determine whether there are any prior trademarks which are identical to the application, or confusingly similar. If the TPI finds an identical or confusingly similar mark, it will reject the application and cite the mark(s) which form the basis of the rejection. Even if the cited mark’s owner consents to the later mark being registered, it is not possible to overcome the TPI’s provisional refusal decision.


Consequently, some trademarks cannot obtain registration in Turkey because they do not pass the TPI’s examination on absolute grounds. Tis is despite the fact that the trademark would not meet oppositions if published.


Use in commerce or intent to use are not a requirement at application stage Contrary to some jurisdictions, trademark applicants in Turkey are not required to prove their use of the mark in commerce at the application stage and are not asked to show their intention to use the mark in this way. Similarly, opponents are not required to demonstrate their use of the mark which they are opposing, even if the five-year grace period has expired.


Similar to many other jurisdictions, Turkish law requires ‘use in commerce’ in order to keep a trademark’s registration alive aſter an initial five-year grace period. However, the trademark holder is required to prove its use in commerce only when a third party initiates a non-use action before the first instance court.


Tis legal arrangement means that the TPI does not oversee the use of the trademark before or aſter the non-use grace period. Te arrangement also means that a registered trademark will effectively remain alive unless a third party successfully initiates a lawsuit for the trademark’s cancellation based on non-use.


Consent letters or sister company arguments are not acceptable In many jurisdictions, consent letters, co-existence agreements and sister


www.worldipreview.com


“A REGISTERED TRADEMARK WILL EFFECTIVELY REMAIN ALIVE UNLESS A THIRD PARTY SUCCESSFULLY INITIATES A LAWSUIT FOR THE TRADEMARK’S CANCELLATION BASED ON NON-USE.”


company arrangements are possible avenues to overcome a local authority’s provisional refusal decision based on earlier registration. As a result, applicants whose trademarks are provisionally refused by the TPI based on a prior registration in Turkey will oſten explore the acceptability of such an arrangement. However, in Turkey, consent letters, co-existence agreements and sister company arrangements are not capable of overcoming a provisional refusal by the TPI. Even if the prior registration holder consents to the trademark, the TPI will not cancel its provisional refusal decision.


One possible solution for applicants when the TPI has provisionally refused their trademark application is to consider buying the registered mark or obtaining a licence from the trademark holder.


All the TPI’s deadlines are strict and cannot be extended Turkish trademark law is regulated by a Decree Law and its regulation. All the relevant deadlines in this legislation are strict, with no processes available for the parties to extend them. Tese deadlines include oppositions, appeals, responses and all types of office action. Failing to meet official deadlines oſten results in parties experiencing significant losses of rights. Terefore, it is very important for parties to pay close attention to the TPI’s deadlines.


Compensation of the costs and the expenses Contrary to some jurisdictions, when a trademark application or an opposition is rejected in Turkey, the applicant or opponent is not required to pay the other party’s fees. When the TPI rejects a trademark application or opposition, the party’s only monetary loss will be the amount it paid for the application.


Isik Ozdogan is a partner at Moroglu Arseven. She can be contacted at: iozdogan@morogluarseven.av.tr


Ezgi Baklaci is a senior associate at Moroglu Arseven. She can be contacted at: ebaklaci@morogluarseven.av.tr


World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2013 185


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196