JURISDICTION REPORT: FRANCE
A NEW APPROACH TO CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Aurélia Marie Cabinet Beau de Loménie
Te regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council no. 608/2013/ EU governing anti-counterfeiting action by customs authorities was published on June 29, 2013, repealing Regulation 1383/2003/EC.
Tis new regulation, which will apply from January 1, 2014, strengthens the role of customs authorities in the interception and the destruction of counterfeit goods entering, or in transit through, EU territory.
Like the prior rule, Regulation 608/2013 deals only with the procedural rules for customs authorities and contains no rules relating to criteria for ascertaining the existence of an infringement of an IP right (recital 10).
Its scope is enlarged and will henceforth include trade names when they are protected under national law, and topographies of semiconductor products as well as utility models and devices which are primarily designed, produced or adapted for the purpose of enabling or facilitating the circumvention of technical measures (Article 2).
Its scope also includes the monitoring of small consignments, due to the growing number of counterfeit goods sent by postal service (Article 26).
However, as announced during the debate on the review of Regulation 1383/2003/EC, non-commercial goods carried by passengers in their personal luggage are not targeted. Te exclusion also applies to goods that are manufactured by a person who is duly authorised by a right holder but are produced in surplus quantity.
With the new regulation and under certain conditions the seized goods may be destroyed under the control of the customs authorities “without there being any need to determine whether an IP right has been infringed under the law of the member state where the goods are found”. When the requirements specified by the text are fulfilled, destruction may be implemented without the intervention of a judge (Article 23).
Tis so-called ‘simplified’ procedure is no longer optional and enables the applicable regime to be unified for all member states of the EU.
Furthermore, the new regulation specifies expressly the factors which must accompany the application for customs intervention to be submitted to the customs authorities. In this respect, the regulation henceforth requires the applicant to communicate specific technical data on the authentic goods (barcodes, images, etc), as well as information relevant to the customs authorities’ analysis and assessment of the risk of infringement of the IP right concerned (authorised distributors, etc).
Finally, contrary to what was expected during the inaugural conference of the exhibition Contrefaçon, sans façon held on the January 29, 2013, the new
regulation does not modify the solution set out by the Nokia-Philips case law relating to counterfeit goods in transit coming from third party countries into the EU and intended for another third party country.
In this decision, the Court of Justice had decided that goods, prima facie not intended for introduction into EU territory, could nevertheless be seized by the customs authorities, if they had convincing evidence or strong clues suggestive of marketing of goods in the EU, which are very difficult to provide.
Te issue of goods in transit will be regulated by forthcoming texts modifying Regulation 207/2009 on the Community trademark and Directive 2008/95 on trademarks, which will soon be debated before the European parliament. Te French customs authorities, who have ceased to intervene against allegedly infringing goods in transit or in transshipment, will thus have to await the adoption of these forthcoming texts.
Aurélia Marie is a partner at Cabinet Beau de Loménie. She can be contacted at:
amarie@bdl-ip.com
170 World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2013
www.worldipreview.com
“REGULATION 608/2013 DEALS ONLY WITH THE PROCEDURAL RULES FOR CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES AND CONTAINS NO RULES RELATING TO CRITERIA FOR ASCERTAINING THE EXISTENCE OF AN INFRINGEMENT OF AN IP RIGHT.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196